PTH vs. VFMO
PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. PTH is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTH returned -0.77%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for VFMO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
PTH vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 23.68% return.
PTH
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -4.72%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -4.72%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 43.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
PTH vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | -1.13% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -8.72% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.68% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTH and VFMO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PTH and VFMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTH vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTH
VFMO
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PTH
VFMO
Financial Services
PTH
VFMO
Basic Materials
PTH
-
VFMO
Communication Services
PTH
-
VFMO
Consumer Cyclical
PTH
-
VFMO
Consumer Defensive
PTH
-
VFMO
Energy
PTH
-
VFMO
Industrials
PTH
-
VFMO
Real Estate
PTH
-
VFMO
Technology
PTH
-
VFMO
Utilities
PTH
-
VFMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTH vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
PTH
VFMO
PTH vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTH | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.96 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 14.97 | -7.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTH | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.05 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.64 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.66 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
PTH vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTH | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.52% | -36.77% | -16.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -10.98% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -24.40% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -25.80% | -24.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.32% | 0.00% | -19.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.00% | -7.77% | -9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 2.90% | +1.76% |
Volatility
PTH vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) at 6.20%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTH | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 6.20% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 16.37% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 21.20% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 21.70% | +3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.24% | 23.57% | +3.67% |
PTH vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTH vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than VFMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 3.11% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTH and VFMO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTH has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to VFMO (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs VFMO's -36.77%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 13.84% vs -0.77% for PTH. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 13.84% return vs -0.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.63% for VFMO.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.13% for VFMO.
VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTH and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer