PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTH vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTH vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PTH has outperformed GSG with an annualized return of 12.78%, while GSG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.69% annualized return.


PTH

1D
1.64%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
-4.72%
1Y
34.27%
3Y*
8.31%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
12.78%

GSG

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
42.58%
6M
41.06%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTH vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTH
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF
-1.13%27.91%2.36%-4.54%-20.61%-3.20%67.26%34.45%-1.23%50.15%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
42.58%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%-23.94%15.62%-13.88%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PTH and GSG is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.18

The correlation between PTH and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTH vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTH
PTH Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTH vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTHGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

5.47

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

14.39

-7.02

PTH vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTH and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTHGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.26

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.70

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.35

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

-0.09

+0.48

Drawdowns

PTH vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTHGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.52%

-89.62%

+36.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-9.46%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.70%

-14.94%

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.07%

-29.12%

-20.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.52%

-57.64%

+4.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.32%

-56.95%

+37.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.00%

-63.71%

+46.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

3.59%

+1.07%

Volatility

PTH vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 7.65%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTHGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

7.65%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.83%

20.42%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

22.95%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.49%

22.61%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.24%

22.03%

+5.21%

PTH vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTH vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTH
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF
3.11%3.07%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTH and GSG have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTH has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to GSG (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 10-year performance, PTH leads with 12.78% vs 7.69% for GSG. On fees, PTH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTH has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

PTH is categorized as Momentum, while GSG is Commodities. PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTH and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer