PTH vs. FMTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. PTH is passively managed, while FMTM is actively managed. Over the past year, PTH returned 34.27% vs 63.62% for FMTM. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.

Performance

PTH vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.

PTH

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: -4.72%
• YTD: -1.13%
• 6M: -4.72%
• 1Y: 34.27%
• 3Y*: 8.31%
• 5Y*: -0.77%
• 10Y*: 12.78%

FMTM

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 31.75%
• 6M: 34.74%
• 1Y: 63.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTH vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	-1.13%	27.36%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	31.75%	27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PTH and FMTM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

PTH vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTH

PTH Risk / Return Rank: 45
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 45

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 82
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTH vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTH	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.80	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	3.43	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.46	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	5.28	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.37	20.62	-13.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTH vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTH and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTH	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	2.80	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	2.38	-1.99

Drawdowns

PTH vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and FMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTH	FMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.52%	-12.12%	-41.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.98%	-12.12%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.32%	0.00%	-19.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.00%	-1.89%	-15.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.66%	3.10%	+1.56%

Volatility

PTH vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) at 6.52%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTH	FMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.84%	6.52%	+2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.83%	17.83%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.31%	22.82%	+0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.49%	22.94%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.24%	22.94%	+4.30%

PTH vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTH vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.00%
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	3.11%	3.07%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTH and FMTM in my portfolio?

PTH and FMTM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTH or FMTM?

PTH has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to FMTM (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

Which ETF is better, PTH or FMTM?

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 34.27% for PTH. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FMTM has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTH or FMTM?

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 34.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTH or FMTM?

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTH or FMTM?

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.

What is the main difference between PTH and FMTM?

Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.45% for FMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.