PTF vs. MGK
PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTF returned 26.39%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for MGK. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.
Performance
PTF vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 69.64% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed MGK with an annualized return of 26.39%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively lower 18.85% annualized return.
PTF
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 69.64%
- 6M
- 66.68%
- 1Y
- 99.51%
- 3Y*
- 39.34%
- 5Y*
- 21.88%
- 10Y*
- 26.39%
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
PTF vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 69.64% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTF and MGK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PTF and MGK shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTF vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTF
MGK
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PTF
MGK
Communication Services
PTF
MGK
Industrials
PTF
MGK
Energy
PTF
MGK
-
Financial Services
PTF
MGK
Basic Materials
PTF
-
MGK
Consumer Cyclical
PTF
-
MGK
Consumer Defensive
PTF
-
MGK
Healthcare
PTF
-
MGK
Real Estate
PTF
-
MGK
Utilities
PTF
-
MGK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTF vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
PTF
MGK
PTF vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTF | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.24 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.36 | 1.37 | +3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.45 | 4.65 | +15.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTF vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTF | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -48.43% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.99% | -16.85% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.11% | -23.36% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -36.01% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | -36.01% | -8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.47% | -5.63% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -7.58% | -5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 4.97% | -0.26% |
Volatility
PTF vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 5.96%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTF | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.30% | 5.96% | +10.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.97% | 13.29% | +18.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.36% | 16.87% | +23.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.34% | 22.72% | +12.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.16% | 21.93% | +11.23% |
PTF vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTF vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than MGK's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTF and MGK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs MGK's -48.43%.
On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.39% vs 18.85% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.39% return vs 18.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PTF is categorized as Momentum, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.05% for MGK.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTF and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer