PTF vs. IGV
PTF (Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index, while IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTF returned 23.35%/yr vs 16.58%/yr for IGV. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
PTF vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 41.44% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -3.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed IGV with an annualized return of 23.35%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively lower 16.58% annualized return.
PTF
- 1D
- 6.41%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- 6M
- 23.32%
- YTD
- 41.44%
- 1Y
- 53.98%
- 3Y*
- 30.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.16%
- 10Y*
- 23.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.87%
IGV
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- 9.01%
- 6M
- 19.47%
- YTD
- -3.47%
- 1Y
- -8.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.51B | $1.27B | $1.68B | |
| $25.15M | $20.80M | $16.47M |
PTF vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 41.44% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -3.47% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTF and IGV is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PTF and IGV has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PTF vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTF
IGV
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PTF
IGV
Communication Services
PTF
IGV
Industrials
PTF
IGV
Energy
PTF
IGV
-
Financial Services
PTF
IGV
Basic Materials
PTF
-
IGV
-
Consumer Cyclical
PTF
-
IGV
Consumer Defensive
PTF
-
IGV
-
Healthcare
PTF
-
IGV
-
Real Estate
PTF
-
IGV
-
Utilities
PTF
-
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTF vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
PTF
IGV
PTF vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTF | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.98 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | -0.22 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | -0.42 | +6.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTF vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTF | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -63.45% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.59% | -36.61% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.59% | -36.61% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -45.85% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | -45.85% | +0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.81% | -13.39% | -8.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -14.49% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.81% | 19.40% | -10.59% |
Volatility
PTF vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 27.09% compared to iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) at 8.56%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTF | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.09% | 8.56% | +18.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.61% | 25.48% | +18.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.31% | 29.57% | +21.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.11% | 28.28% | +9.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.66% | 26.51% | +8.15% |
PTF vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTF vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IGV's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTF and IGV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (27.09%) compared to IGV (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 23.35% vs 16.58% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 8.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.35% return vs 16.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
IGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PTF is categorized as Momentum, while IGV is Technology Equities. PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.39% for IGV.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTF and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer