PTF vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTF returned 21.88%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

PTF vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 69.64% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 6.79% return.

PTF

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 6.00%
• YTD: 69.64%
• 6M: 66.68%
• 1Y: 95.99%
• 3Y*: 39.34%
• 5Y*: 21.88%
• 10Y*: 26.39%

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTF vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF	69.64%	5.68%	43.65%	33.73%	-31.75%	18.10%	82.06%	5.47%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PTF and FNGS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019	0.77

The correlation between PTF and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTF vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTF	FNGS
Technology	92.9%	59.9%
Communication Services	5.8%	28.8%
Industrials	1.8%	-
Energy	1.6%	-
Financial Services	1.4%	10.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PTF vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTF

PTF Risk / Return Rank: 83
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTF vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTF	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	0.79	+1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	1.19	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.15	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.36	0.75	+4.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.45	2.12	+18.33

PTF vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTF vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTF	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.38%	-48.98%	-6.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.99%	-22.93%	+4.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.11%	-26.77%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.88%	-48.98%	+4.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.47%	-9.63%	+5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.26%	-10.85%	-2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.71%	8.05%	-3.34%

Volatility

PTF vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.74%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTF	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.30%	8.74%	+7.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.97%	17.19%	+14.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.36%	21.65%	+18.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.34%	30.10%	+5.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.16%	31.17%	+1.99%

PTF vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTF vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF	0.01%	0.21%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.04%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTF and FNGS in my portfolio?

PTF and FNGS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTF or FNGS?

PTF has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, PTF or FNGS?

On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 21.88% vs 19.76% for FNGS. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTF or FNGS?

Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 21.88% return vs 19.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTF or FNGS?

FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTF or FNGS?

PTF has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.

What is the main difference between PTF and FNGS?

PTF is categorized as Momentum, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.