PTF vs. EEMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PTF tracks the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index while EEMO tracks the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTF returned 26.93%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for EEMO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.

Performance

PTF vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 77.58% return, which is significantly higher than EEMO's 40.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed EEMO with an annualized return of 26.93%, while EEMO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.

PTF

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 19.05%
• YTD: 77.58%
• 6M: 74.93%
• 1Y: 109.08%
• 3Y*: 43.28%
• 5Y*: 23.79%
• 10Y*: 26.93%

EEMO

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 18.59%
• YTD: 40.25%
• 6M: 41.33%
• 1Y: 57.41%
• 3Y*: 25.30%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTF vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF	77.58%	5.68%	43.65%	33.73%	-31.75%	18.10%	82.06%	46.71%	0.01%	32.07%
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	40.25%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PTF and EEMO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012	0.45

The correlation between PTF and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTF vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTF	EEMO
Technology	92.9%	43.8%
Communication Services	5.8%	1.5%
Industrials	1.8%	11.5%
Energy	1.6%	2.5%
Financial Services	1.4%	18.0%
Basic Materials	-	12.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.2%
Healthcare	-	3.0%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

PTF vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTF

PTF Risk / Return Rank: 82
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 71
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 93

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 75
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTF vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTF	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	2.36	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.28	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.46	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.10	3.91	+2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.27	15.67	+8.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTF vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTF	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	2.36	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.37	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.41	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.13	+0.40

Drawdowns

PTF vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than EEMO's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and EEMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTF	EEMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.38%	-48.47%	-6.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.99%	-14.75%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.11%	-26.06%	-10.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.88%	-34.03%	-10.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.88%	-46.57%	+1.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.32%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-20.17%	+6.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	3.67%	+0.84%

Volatility

PTF vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) is 13.27%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that PTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTF	EEMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.27%	14.32%	-1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.47%	22.10%	+7.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.39%	24.45%	+13.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.95%	19.33%	+15.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.94%	21.59%	+11.35%

PTF vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTF vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than EEMO's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.64%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF	0.01%	0.21%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.04%	0.26%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTF and EEMO in my portfolio?

PTF and EEMO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTF or EEMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to PTF (13.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

Which ETF is better, PTF or EEMO?

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.93% vs 8.88% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, PTF has been the lower-risk option at 13.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTF or EEMO?

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.93% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTF or EEMO?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTF or EEMO?

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

What is the main difference between PTF and EEMO?

PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.31% for EEMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.