PTEU vs. QDPL
PTEU (Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTEU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot European Index, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer. PTEU is passively managed, while QDPL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PTEU returned 10.93%/yr vs 20.64%/yr for QDPL. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTEU charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QDPL.
Performance
PTEU vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTEU achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than QDPL's 10.40% return.
PTEU
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 18.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
QDPL
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTEU vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTEU Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF | 6.24% | 30.80% | -0.50% | 12.45% | -7.46% | 0.72% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.40% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTEU and QDPL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PTEU and QDPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTEU vs. QDPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTEU
QDPL
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
PTEU
QDPL
Industrials
PTEU
QDPL
Technology
PTEU
QDPL
Consumer Cyclical
PTEU
QDPL
Utilities
PTEU
QDPL
Healthcare
PTEU
QDPL
Consumer Defensive
PTEU
QDPL
Basic Materials
PTEU
QDPL
Energy
PTEU
QDPL
Communication Services
PTEU
QDPL
Real Estate
PTEU
QDPL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTEU vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
PTEU
QDPL
PTEU vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTEU | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 2.23 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 3.11 | -1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.41 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 3.06 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 14.37 | -9.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTEU | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.23 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.83 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
PTEU vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTEU drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, which is greater than QDPL's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEU and QDPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTEU | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.45% | -22.59% | -12.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.82% | -8.65% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.04% | -17.75% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -0.65% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.50% | -5.14% | -9.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 1.84% | +1.85% |
Volatility
PTEU vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) at 2.69%. This indicates that PTEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTEU | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 2.69% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.00% | 9.00% | +5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 11.89% | +4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 15.01% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 15.01% | -0.43% |
PTEU vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTEU has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTEU vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
PTEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than QDPL's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTEU Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF | 1.81% | 1.92% | 3.49% | 2.74% | 0.69% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 3.43% | 1.86% | 0.60% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTEU and QDPL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTEU has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to QDPL (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEU dropped -35.45% vs QDPL's -22.59%.
On 3-year performance, QDPL leads with 20.64% vs 10.93% for PTEU. On fees, QDPL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QDPL has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDPL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTEU.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 1.81% for PTEU.
PTEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTEU and 0.60% for QDPL.
QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTEU and QDPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer