PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSWD vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSWD vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSWD achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 20.36% return.


PSWD

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.30%
6M
26.74%
YTD
26.31%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.24%

VGT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.30%
6M
21.30%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$62.12K$66.88K$71.33K
$440.89M$515.41M$573.34M

PSWD vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
26.31%1.69%9.46%18.58%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
20.36%21.77%29.30%9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PSWD and VGT is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.64

The correlation between PSWD and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSWD vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSWD
VGT

Technology

98.1%
98.6%

Industrials

1.1%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Communication Services

0.1%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.1%

Healthcare

0.1%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%
0.3%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.0%

Technology

PSWD
98.1%
VGT
98.6%

Industrials

PSWD
1.1%
VGT
0.4%

Real Estate

PSWD
0.4%
VGT

-

Communication Services

PSWD
0.1%
VGT
0.5%

Financial Services

PSWD
0.1%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PSWD
0.1%
VGT
0.1%

Healthcare

PSWD
0.1%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

PSWD
0.0%
VGT

-

Energy

PSWD
0.0%
VGT
0.3%

Utilities

PSWD
0.0%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

PSWD
0.0%
VGT
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSWD vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSWD
PSWD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PSWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSWD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PSWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSWD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSWD vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSWDVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.94

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.78

5.23

-3.45

PSWD vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSWD and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSWD vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSWDVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-54.63%

+30.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.70%

-16.40%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-27.23%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-9.93%

+3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-7.95%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.55%

6.07%

+4.48%

Volatility

PSWD vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.42%. This indicates that PSWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSWDVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

8.42%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.02%

20.14%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.31%

24.28%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.05%

25.83%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

24.89%

-0.84%

PSWD vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSWD vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
0.62%0.88%1.49%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSWD and VGT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSWD has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to VGT (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSWD dropped -23.70% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 26.48% vs 17.15% for PSWD. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 8.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 26.48% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PSWD.

PSWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

PSWD tracks Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSWD and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer