PSWD vs. SNPG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PSWD (Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF) and SNPG (Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSWD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while SNPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSWD returned 20.08%/yr vs 22.93%/yr for SNPG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSWD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SNPG.

Performance

PSWD vs. SNPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSWD achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than SNPG's 10.08% return.

PSWD

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 12.87%
• 6M: 25.45%
• YTD: 29.56%
• 1Y: 21.93%
• 3Y*: 20.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNPG

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 0.01%
• 6M: 9.54%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 1Y: 22.73%
• 3Y*: 22.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSWD vs. SNPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF	29.56%	1.69%	9.46%	18.58%
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	10.08%	18.22%	33.99%	8.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PSWD and SNPG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.59

The correlation between PSWD and SNPG shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSWD vs. SNPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSWD	SNPG
Technology	97.8%	43.7%
Industrials	1.2%	10.2%
Real Estate	0.5%	1.2%
Communication Services	0.1%	12.5%
Financial Services	0.1%	11.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	5.5%
Healthcare	0.1%	13.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	1.0%
Energy	0.0%	0.0%
Basic Materials	0.0%	1.0%
Utilities	0.0%	0.5%

Return for Risk

PSWD vs. SNPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSWD

PSWD Risk / Return Rank: 26
PSWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PSWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
PSWD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PSWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
PSWD Martin Ratio Rank: 22

SNPG

SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 50
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSWD vs. SNPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSWD	SNPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.41	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	2.03	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.25	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	1.74	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.09	6.95	-4.86

PSWD vs. SNPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the SNPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSWD and SNPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSWD vs. SNPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, which is greater than SNPG's maximum drawdown of -21.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and SNPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSWD	SNPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.70%	-21.69%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.70%	-13.12%	-10.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.70%	-21.69%	-2.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-5.11%	+2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-2.53%	-3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.51%	3.28%	+7.23%

Volatility

PSWD vs. SNPG - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) have volatilities of 8.09% and 7.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSWD	SNPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.09%	7.93%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.60%	14.27%	+8.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.55%	16.24%	+10.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.92%	18.34%	+5.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.92%	18.34%	+5.58%

PSWD vs. SNPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPG's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PSWD vs. SNPG - Dividend Comparison

PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than SNPG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF	0.60%	0.88%	1.49%	0.55%	0.00%
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	0.47%	0.49%	0.57%	0.95%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSWD and SNPG in my portfolio?

PSWD and SNPG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSWD or SNPG?

PSWD has higher volatility (8.09%) compared to SNPG (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSWD dropped -23.70% vs SNPG's -21.69%.

Which ETF is better, PSWD or SNPG?

On 3-year performance, SNPG leads with 22.93% vs 20.08% for PSWD. On fees, SNPG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNPG has been the lower-risk option at 7.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSWD or SNPG?

Over the 3-year period, SNPG has performed better with a 22.93% return vs 20.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSWD or SNPG?

SNPG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PSWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSWD or SNPG?

PSWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.47% for SNPG.

What is the main difference between PSWD and SNPG?

PSWD is categorized as Technology Equities, while SNPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. PSWD tracks Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.15% for SNPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.