SNPG vs. ^BSE500

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and S&P BSE-500 (^BSE500).

SNPG is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2022.

Performance

SNPG vs. ^BSE500 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and S&P BSE-500 (^BSE500). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SNPG vs. ^BSE500 - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	-8.48%	18.22%	33.99%	38.45%	1.81%
^BSE500 S&P BSE-500	-15.52%	1.33%	11.40%	24.21%	-2.60%

Different Trading Currencies

SNPG is traded in USD, while ^BSE500 is traded in INR. To make them comparable, the ^BSE500 values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPG achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly higher than ^BSE500's -15.52% return.

SNPG

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -4.96%
• YTD: -8.48%
• 6M: -5.79%
• 1Y: 15.04%
• 3Y*: 20.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

^BSE500

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -10.00%
• YTD: -15.52%
• 6M: -13.32%
• 1Y: -9.84%
• 3Y*: 7.59%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SNPG vs. ^BSE500 — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPG

SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

^BSE500

^BSE500 Risk / Return Rank: 6
^BSE500 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
^BSE500 Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
^BSE500 Omega Ratio Rank: 6
^BSE500 Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
^BSE500 Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPG vs. ^BSE500 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and S&P BSE-500 (^BSE500). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNPG	^BSE500	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	-0.61	+1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	-0.77	+2.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.91	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	-0.51	+1.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.57	-1.69	+6.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNPG vs. ^BSE500 - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPG Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the ^BSE500 Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPG and ^BSE500, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNPG	^BSE500	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	-0.61	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.30	+1.01

Correlation

The correlation between SNPG and ^BSE500 is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

SNPG vs. ^BSE500 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, smaller than the maximum ^BSE500 drawdown of -47.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and ^BSE500.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPG	^BSE500	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.69%	-38.39%	+16.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-14.86%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.40%	-14.97%	+5.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-5.92%	+3.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.73%	-0.26%

Volatility

SNPG vs. ^BSE500 - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) is 6.31%, while S&P BSE-500 (^BSE500) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that SNPG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^BSE500 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPG	^BSE500	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	8.22%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.53%	11.77%	-1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.34%	16.41%	+3.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.06%	15.74%	+2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.06%	18.06%	0.00%