PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSWD vs. ARMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSWD vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PSWD

1D
-3.24%
1M
22.87%
YTD
22.48%
6M
16.89%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMH

1D
2.87%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSWD vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PSWD and ARMH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSWD vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSWD
PSWD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PSWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSWD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PSWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSWD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSWD vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSWDARMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

PSWD vs. ARMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSWDARMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

471,500.14

-471,499.37

Drawdowns

PSWD vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and ARMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSWDARMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-1.61%

-22.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

0.00%

-3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

-0.40%

-6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

Volatility

PSWD vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSWDARMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.46%

113.00%

-87.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.68%

113.00%

-89.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.68%

113.00%

-89.32%

PSWD vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSWD vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
0.72%0.88%1.49%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSWD and ARMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PSWD.

PSWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.19% for ARMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSWD and ARMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer