PSWD vs. ARMH
PSWD (Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. PSWD is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSWD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
PSWD vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PSWD
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSWD vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 7.63% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSWD and ARMH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSWD vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank
PSWD
ARMH
PSWD vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSWD | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSWD | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 471,500.14 | -471,499.37 |
Drawdowns
PSWD vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSWD | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -1.61% | -22.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | 0.00% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -0.40% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.38% | — | — |
Volatility
PSWD vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSWD | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 113.00% | -87.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 113.00% | -89.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 113.00% | -89.32% |
PSWD vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PSWD vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 0.72% | 0.88% | 1.49% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSWD and ARMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PSWD.
PSWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for PSWD and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer