PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSWD.DE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSWD.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PSWD.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSWD.DE achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, PSWD.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.99%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.


PSWD.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
5.99%
YTD
16.67%
6M
18.47%
1Y
33.05%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
11.99%

SCHG

1D
0.00%
1M
6.68%
YTD
8.84%
6M
7.52%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
16.93%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSWD.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSWD.DE
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
16.67%14.64%17.68%12.73%-3.63%31.90%-3.90%26.32%-9.60%5.60%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.69%3.56%43.86%45.60%-27.58%37.70%27.67%39.09%3.27%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PSWD.DE and SCHG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2014

0.43

The correlation between PSWD.DE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSWD.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSWD.DE
PSWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PSWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSWD.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSWD.DESCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.12

1.49

+1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.19

1.97

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.27

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.59

1.51

+4.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.51

4.36

+18.15

PSWD.DE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSWD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSWD.DE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSWD.DESCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

1.49

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.77

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.86

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.92

-0.24

Drawdowns

PSWD.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD.DE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSWD.DESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.39%

-31.88%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.89%

-15.64%

+9.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.19%

-28.18%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.19%

-30.34%

+12.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-31.88%

-4.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.51%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-5.23%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

5.40%

-3.94%

Volatility

PSWD.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 2.80%. This indicates that PSWD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSWD.DESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

2.80%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

11.06%

-3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

15.83%

-5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.16%

21.97%

-8.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

21.87%

-6.68%

PSWD.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSWD.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSWD.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

PSWD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSWD.DE
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
1.75%2.03%2.27%2.48%2.66%1.92%1.98%2.37%2.56%2.06%1.97%2.02%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSWD.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSWD.DE.

PSWD.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. PSWD.DE tracks FTSE RAFI All-World 3000, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSWD.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSWD.DE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer