PSPFX vs. UNWPX
PSPFX (U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund) and UNWPX (U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund) are both mutual funds - PSPFX is a Energy Equities fund managed by US Global, while UNWPX is a Precious Metals fund managed by US Global. Over the past 10 years, PSPFX returned 6.94%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for UNWPX. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSPFX charges 1.54%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for UNWPX.
Performance
PSPFX vs. UNWPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSPFX achieves a -4.83% return, which is significantly lower than UNWPX's 2.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PSPFX has outperformed UNWPX with an annualized return of 6.94%, while UNWPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.
PSPFX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- 6M
- -11.72%
- YTD
- -4.83%
- 1Y
- 47.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 6.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.02%
UNWPX
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 69.58%
- 3Y*
- 29.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PSPFX vs. UNWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSPFX U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund | -4.83% | 80.27% | -3.74% | -7.67% | -12.39% | 13.97% | 37.05% | 7.80% | -24.97% | 19.62% |
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 2.31% | 136.32% | 2.07% | -16.18% | -32.95% | -13.88% | 70.83% | 22.59% | -31.49% | -3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSPFX and UNWPX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 1985 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PSPFX and UNWPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSPFX vs. UNWPX — Risk / Return Rank
PSPFX
UNWPX
PSPFX vs. UNWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) and U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSPFX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.36 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 5.76 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSPFX vs. UNWPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSPFX drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, smaller than the maximum UNWPX drawdown of -83.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSPFX and UNWPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSPFX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.09% | -83.78% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.31% | -29.02% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.31% | -29.02% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.15% | -58.13% | +18.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.80% | -69.19% | +12.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.82% | -42.35% | +18.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.42% | -49.46% | +7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.26% | 11.84% | -2.58% |
Volatility
PSPFX vs. UNWPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) is 6.44%, while U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a volatility of 12.12%. This indicates that PSPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSPFX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 12.12% | -5.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.91% | 38.48% | -14.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.16% | 45.76% | -16.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 32.10% | -8.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 30.70% | -8.65% |
PSPFX vs. UNWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSPFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than UNWPX's 1.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSPFX vs. UNWPX - Dividend Comparison
PSPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.70%, less than UNWPX's 87.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSPFX U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund | 47.70% | 0.83% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 15.68% | 18.92% | 5.49% | 1.90% | 4.70% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 1.12% |
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 87.75% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 17.45% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSPFX and UNWPX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNWPX has higher volatility (12.12%) compared to PSPFX (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSPFX dropped -79.09% vs UNWPX's -83.78%.
PSPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSPFX and UNWPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer