PSPFX vs. SPPP
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP).
PSPFX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Aug 2, 1983. SPPP is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Dec 19, 2012.
Performance
PSPFX vs. SPPP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSPFX vs. SPPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSPFX U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund | 5.05% | 80.27% | -3.74% | -7.67% | -12.39% | 13.97% | 37.05% | 7.80% | -24.97% | 19.62% |
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -7.78% | 89.43% | -11.89% | -25.86% | -2.37% | -21.77% | 23.84% | 46.00% | 5.53% | 35.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSPFX achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP's -7.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSPFX having a 9.17% annualized return and SPPP not far ahead at 9.27%.
PSPFX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -13.48%
- YTD
- 5.05%
- 6M
- 24.43%
- 1Y
- 84.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
SPPP
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -18.00%
- YTD
- -7.78%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 56.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSPFX vs. SPPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSPFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SPPP's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSPFX vs. SPPP — Risk / Return Rank
PSPFX
SPPP
PSPFX vs. SPPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSPFX | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.15 | 1.14 | +2.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.48 | 1.56 | +1.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.24 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 1.58 | +3.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.63 | 4.81 | +13.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSPFX | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15 | 1.14 | +2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | -0.12 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.28 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.11 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSPFX and SPPP is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PSPFX vs. SPPP - Dividend Comparison
PSPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSPFX U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund | 0.79% | 0.83% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 15.68% | 18.92% | 5.49% | 1.90% | 4.70% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 1.12% |
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PSPFX vs. SPPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSPFX drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, which is greater than SPPP's maximum drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSPFX and SPPP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSPFX | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.09% | -59.09% | -20.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.96% | -37.42% | +19.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.15% | -59.09% | +19.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.80% | -59.09% | +2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.91% | -31.22% | +15.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.65% | -26.42% | -16.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 12.30% | -7.83% |
Volatility
PSPFX vs. SPPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) is 10.47%, while Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) has a volatility of 16.95%. This indicates that PSPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSPFX | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 16.95% | -6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.43% | 46.40% | -22.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.28% | 49.39% | -22.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 34.38% | -11.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 32.88% | -11.24% |