PSP vs. XOVR
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares. PSP is passively managed, while XOVR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSP returned 0.15%/yr vs 5.32%/yr for XOVR. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XOVR.
Performance
PSP vs. XOVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -12.29% return, which is significantly lower than XOVR's 0.45% return.
PSP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -15.12%
- YTD
- -12.29%
- 1Y
- -13.87%
- 3Y*
- 8.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
XOVR
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- —
PSP vs. XOVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -12.29% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 0.95% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.45% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and XOVR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between PSP and XOVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSP vs. XOVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
XOVR
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSP
XOVR
Consumer Defensive
PSP
XOVR
-
Industrials
PSP
XOVR
Communication Services
PSP
XOVR
Healthcare
PSP
XOVR
Basic Materials
PSP
XOVR
-
Technology
PSP
XOVR
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
-
XOVR
Energy
PSP
-
XOVR
Real Estate
PSP
-
XOVR
-
Utilities
PSP
-
XOVR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. XOVR — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
XOVR
PSP vs. XOVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSP | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.07 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 0.27 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 0.59 | -1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSP vs. XOVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than XOVR's maximum drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and XOVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -56.28% | -29.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -24.32% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -25.23% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -49.35% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.57% | -6.82% | -9.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.62% | -18.26% | -12.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.23% | 11.14% | +0.09% |
Volatility
PSP vs. XOVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is 5.55%, while ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a volatility of 10.74%. This indicates that PSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 10.74% | -5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 18.54% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 23.05% | -2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 26.64% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 27.03% | -4.75% |
PSP vs. XOVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than XOVR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. XOVR - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, while XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.21% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and XOVR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (10.74%) compared to PSP (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs XOVR's -56.28%.
On 5-year performance, XOVR leads with 5.32% vs 0.15% for PSP. On fees, XOVR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XOVR has performed better with a 5.32% return vs 0.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOVR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while XOVR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ERShares. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.75% for XOVR.
XOVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and XOVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer