PSP vs. XOVR
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares. PSP is passively managed, while XOVR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSP returned 0.37%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for XOVR. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XOVR.
Performance
PSP vs. XOVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly lower than XOVR's -4.47% return.
PSP
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- 6M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 1Y
- -5.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.63%
XOVR
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.16M | $1.10M | $2.69M | |
| $32.19M | $37.02M | $109.67M |
PSP vs. XOVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -6.39% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 0.95% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -4.47% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and XOVR is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between PSP and XOVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSP vs. XOVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
XOVR
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSP
XOVR
Industrials
PSP
XOVR
Consumer Defensive
PSP
XOVR
-
Communication Services
PSP
XOVR
Healthcare
PSP
XOVR
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
XOVR
Basic Materials
PSP
XOVR
-
Technology
PSP
XOVR
Energy
PSP
-
XOVR
Real Estate
PSP
-
XOVR
-
Utilities
PSP
-
XOVR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. XOVR — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
XOVR
PSP vs. XOVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSP | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.01 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | -0.04 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | -0.08 | -0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSP vs. XOVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than XOVR's maximum drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and XOVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -56.28% | -29.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.27% | -24.32% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -25.23% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -49.35% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.96% | -11.38% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.57% | -18.21% | -12.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.65% | 11.53% | +0.12% |
Volatility
PSP vs. XOVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is 5.48%, while ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that PSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 7.84% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.91% | 19.11% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 23.67% | -3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 26.68% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 27.03% | -4.70% |
PSP vs. XOVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than XOVR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. XOVR - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, while XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 5.82% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and XOVR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to PSP (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs XOVR's -56.28%.
On 5-year performance, XOVR leads with 3.37% vs 0.37% for PSP. On fees, XOVR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 5.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XOVR has performed better with a 3.37% return vs 0.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOVR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while XOVR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ERShares. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.75% for XOVR.
XOVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and XOVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer