PSP vs. POW
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. PSP is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
PSP vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -9.07% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 31.51% return.
PSP
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- 6M
- -9.78%
- YTD
- -9.07%
- 1Y
- -8.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.48%
POW
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.21M | $2.19M | $3.04M | |
| $1.20M | $1.24M | $2.68M |
PSP vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -9.07% | -0.55% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 31.51% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and POW is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSP vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSP | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSP vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -28.02% | -57.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.51% | -22.73% | +9.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -5.52% | -25.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.63% | — | — |
Volatility
PSP vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.19% | 34.38% | -14.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 34.38% | -10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 34.38% | -12.08% |
PSP vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than POW's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 5.99% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and POW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 0.15% for POW.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for PSP and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer