PSP vs. MSTZ
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. PSP is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, PSP returned -9.44% vs 205.90% for MSTZ. Their -0.43 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
PSP vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -9.07% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -30.44% return.
PSP
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- 6M
- -9.78%
- YTD
- -9.07%
- 1Y
- -9.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.48%
MSTZ
- 1D
- 8.95%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- 6M
- -24.16%
- YTD
- -30.44%
- 1Y
- 205.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -86.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $101.73M | $133.33M | $177.41M | |
| $1.20M | $1.24M | $2.68M |
PSP vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -9.07% | 6.49% | 1.33% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -30.44% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and MSTZ is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | -0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
MSTZ
PSP vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSP | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.28 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 2.44 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 4.53 | -5.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSP vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -99.38% | +13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.27% | -84.89% | +62.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.51% | -97.63% | +84.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -94.63% | +64.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.63% | 45.62% | -33.99% |
Volatility
PSP vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is 4.92%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that PSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 37.86% | -32.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.69% | 134.52% | -117.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.19% | 150.23% | -130.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 169.87% | -145.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 169.87% | -147.57% |
PSP vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 5.99% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to PSP (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 205.90% vs -9.44% for PSP. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 205.90% return vs -9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer