PSMJ vs. AIOO
PSMJ (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.
Performance
PSMJ vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.34% return.
PSMJ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIOO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSMJ vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 4.52% | 6.39% |
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF | 2.34% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMJ and AIOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMJ vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank
PSMJ
AIOO
PSMJ vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMJ | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMJ | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 2.79 | -1.60 |
Drawdowns
PSMJ vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and AIOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMJ | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -0.74% | -10.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.13% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -0.17% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | — | — |
Volatility
PSMJ vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMJ | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.72% | 1.99% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 1.99% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 1.99% | +6.96% |
PSMJ vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMJ vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSMJ nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMJ and AIOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSMJ is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSMJ is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AIOO.
PSMJ and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMJ and 0.64% for AIOO.
Find the right allocation for PSMJ and AIOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer