PSLV.TO vs. PHYS
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS).
Performance
PSLV.TO vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSLV.TO vs. PHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSLV.TO Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 4.37% | 134.39% | 29.63% | -4.04% | 9.85% | -14.35% | 39.25% | 11.53% | 1.73% |
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 10.71% | 56.43% | 37.29% | 10.49% | 5.19% | -5.70% | 21.80% | 12.33% | 3.06% |
Different Trading Currencies
PSLV.TO is traded in CAD, while PHYS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PHYS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
PSLV.TO:
CA$19.24B
PHYS:
$17.15B
PSLV.TO:
CA$5.19
PHYS:
$12.73
PSLV.TO:
6.54
PHYS:
2.84
PSLV.TO:
0.03
PHYS:
0.03
PSLV.TO:
6.52
PHYS:
7.08
PSLV.TO:
2.06
PHYS:
1.07
PSLV.TO:
CA$2.95B
PHYS:
$2.38B
PSLV.TO:
CA$2.95B
PHYS:
$4.38B
PSLV.TO:
CA$2.94B
PHYS:
$5.95B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSLV.TO achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS's 8.78% return.
PSLV.TO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -16.80%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 52.56%
- 1Y
- 105.39%
- 3Y*
- 44.48%
- 5Y*
- 24.68%
- 10Y*
- —
PHYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.43%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 19.17%
- 1Y
- 42.75%
- 3Y*
- 33.12%
- 5Y*
- 23.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSLV.TO vs. PHYS — Risk / Return Rank
PSLV.TO
PHYS
PSLV.TO vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSLV.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 1.60 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 1.99 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 2.34 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 8.14 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSLV.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.60 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 1.42 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSLV.TO and PHYS is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PSLV.TO vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSLV.TO nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PSLV.TO vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSLV.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than PHYS's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLV.TO and PHYS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSLV.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.53% | -48.16% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.47% | -19.35% | -20.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.47% | -21.80% | -17.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.25% | -11.80% | -19.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.36% | -21.07% | +5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.77% | 5.38% | +7.39% |
Volatility
PSLV.TO vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.94% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) at 10.24%. This indicates that PSLV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSLV.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.94% | 10.24% | +7.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.40% | 24.07% | +30.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.75% | 26.87% | +27.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 16.80% | +15.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.03% | 15.66% | +21.37% |
Financials
PSLV.TO vs. PHYS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Silver Trust and Sprott Physical Gold Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities