PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSL vs. XSVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSL vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 27.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PSL has underperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 8.05%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.04% annualized return.


PSL

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.23%
6M
4.39%
YTD
14.41%
1Y
6.53%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
8.05%
ALL TIME*
9.36%

XSVM

1D
1.19%
1M
3.59%
6M
17.18%
YTD
27.31%
1Y
43.31%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
13.04%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$139.56K$200.24K$192.10K
$2.64M$2.37M$2.08M

PSL vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSL
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF
14.41%-3.47%15.42%12.32%-7.76%6.88%18.15%14.16%0.92%21.82%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
27.31%7.47%2.30%20.20%-13.63%56.36%5.08%30.01%-12.33%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PSL and XSVM is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and XSVM has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSL vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSL
XSVM

Consumer Defensive

86.4%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
18.1%

Financial Services

1.9%
45.1%

Industrials

1.2%
5.3%

Basic Materials

-

3.0%

Communication Services

-

2.6%

Energy

-

5.7%

Healthcare

-

1.7%

Real Estate

-

9.7%

Technology

-

2.6%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Consumer Defensive

PSL
86.4%
XSVM
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PSL
10.6%
XSVM
18.1%

Financial Services

PSL
1.9%
XSVM
45.1%

Industrials

PSL
1.2%
XSVM
5.3%

Basic Materials

PSL

-

XSVM
3.0%

Communication Services

PSL

-

XSVM
2.6%

Energy

PSL

-

XSVM
5.7%

Healthcare

PSL

-

XSVM
1.7%

Real Estate

PSL

-

XSVM
9.7%

Technology

PSL

-

XSVM
2.6%

Utilities

PSL

-

XSVM
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSL vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSL
PSL Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSL Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSL vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSLXSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.43

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

4.32

-3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.05

13.79

-12.74

PSL vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSL and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSL vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and XSVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSLXSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-62.57%

+20.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.64%

-10.08%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.64%

-26.21%

+12.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.96%

-26.21%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.67%

-49.02%

+14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.28%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-11.48%

+5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.22%

3.15%

+3.07%

Volatility

PSL vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) at 4.25%. This indicates that PSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSLXSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

4.25%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

11.78%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.66%

17.83%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

22.34%

-7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

25.01%

-8.47%

PSL vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSL vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than XSVM's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSL
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF
0.73%0.93%0.60%1.37%1.98%1.24%0.80%0.47%0.75%0.34%2.08%1.18%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.73%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSL and XSVM have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSL has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to XSVM (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

On 10-year performance, XSVM leads with 13.04% vs 8.05% for PSL. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 8.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.73% for PSL.

PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSL and XSVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer