PSIX vs. GFI
PSIX (Power Solutions International, Inc.) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. PSIX operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, PSIX returned 9.24%/yr vs 26.67%/yr for GFI. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PSIX vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSIX achieves a -30.26% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's -15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PSIX has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 9.24%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 26.67% annualized return.
PSIX
- 1D
- 5.96%
- 1M
- -47.50%
- YTD
- -30.26%
- 6M
- -33.00%
- 1Y
- -16.09%
- 3Y*
- 158.76%
- 5Y*
- 56.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
GFI
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -15.43%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- 51.45%
- 3Y*
- 36.70%
- 5Y*
- 31.29%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
PSIX vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSIX Power Solutions International, Inc. | -30.26% | 92.07% | 1,351.22% | -31.67% | 0.00% | -9.09% | -58.23% | -14.59% | 23.33% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -15.43% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSIX and GFI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2012 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, PSIX and GFI have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
PSIX:
$919.06M
GFI:
$32.09B
PSIX:
$4.43
GFI:
$5.39
PSIX:
8.99
GFI:
6.66
PSIX:
0.09
GFI:
0.11
PSIX:
1.57
GFI:
2.30
PSIX:
4.95
GFI:
3.81
PSIX:
$586.96M
GFI:
$13.98B
PSIX:
$172.81M
GFI:
$7.34B
PSIX:
$102.78M
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSIX vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
PSIX
GFI
PSIX vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSIX | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.19 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 1.29 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 3.29 | -3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSIX | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 0.87 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.60 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.49 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.12 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
PSIX vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSIX drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIX and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSIX | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.55% | -88.05% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.60% | -39.97% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.60% | -39.97% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.37% | -56.22% | -28.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.77% | -63.09% | -30.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.58% | -39.97% | -25.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.23% | -44.26% | -23.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.00% | 15.69% | +20.31% |
Volatility
PSIX vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) has a higher volatility of 60.17% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 15.34%. This indicates that PSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSIX | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 60.17% | 15.34% | +44.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.62% | 45.82% | +43.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.20% | 59.39% | +43.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.43% | 52.26% | +61.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.98% | 54.86% | +51.12% |
Dividends
PSIX vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
PSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.13% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
PSIX Power Solutions International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PSIX vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power Solutions International, Inc. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PSIX and GFI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSIX has higher volatility (60.17%) compared to GFI (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIX dropped -98.55% vs GFI's -88.05%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSIX and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer