PSI vs. HLAL
PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while HLAL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSI returned 30.45%/yr vs 15.03%/yr for HLAL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
PSI vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 93.40% return, which is significantly higher than HLAL's 14.51% return.
PSI
- 1D
- 5.16%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 93.40%
- 6M
- 86.01%
- 1Y
- 182.03%
- 3Y*
- 52.78%
- 5Y*
- 30.45%
- 10Y*
- 33.31%
HLAL
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 37.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.03%
- 10Y*
- —
PSI vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 93.40% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 21.57% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 14.51% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSI and HLAL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between PSI and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSI vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSI
HLAL
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PSI
HLAL
Industrials
PSI
HLAL
Basic Materials
PSI
-
HLAL
Communication Services
PSI
-
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
PSI
-
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
PSI
-
HLAL
Energy
PSI
-
HLAL
Financial Services
PSI
-
HLAL
Healthcare
PSI
-
HLAL
Real Estate
PSI
-
HLAL
Utilities
PSI
-
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSI vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
PSI
HLAL
PSI vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSI | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.49 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.84 | 3.70 | +8.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.10 | 16.89 | +25.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSI | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.64 | 2.77 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.86 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.86 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
PSI vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSI | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.96% | -33.57% | -29.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -10.20% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.07% | -21.67% | -19.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.85% | -23.18% | -21.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.89% | -3.61% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.93% | -5.00% | -10.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 2.23% | +2.11% |
Volatility
PSI vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 18.07% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 5.14%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSI | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.07% | 5.14% | +12.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.42% | 10.67% | +21.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.52% | 13.68% | +25.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.19% | 17.67% | +20.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.29% | 20.24% | +15.05% |
PSI vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSI vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than HLAL's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSI and HLAL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (18.07%) compared to HLAL (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 5-year performance, PSI leads with 30.45% vs 15.03% for HLAL. On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSI has performed better with a 30.45% return vs 15.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.
HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.05% for PSI.
PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while HLAL is Large Cap Growth Equities. PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.50% for HLAL.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.64 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSI and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer