PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSI vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSI vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 112.90% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has outperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 34.59%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively lower 14.13% annualized return.


PSI

1D
3.00%
1M
9.80%
YTD
112.90%
6M
110.54%
1Y
207.41%
3Y*
55.80%
5Y*
32.57%
10Y*
34.59%

DGRW

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
7.88%
6M
7.92%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSI vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
112.90%36.32%17.17%49.06%-34.43%46.55%56.75%52.49%-11.55%40.16%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
7.88%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PSI and DGRW is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.68

The correlation between PSI and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSI vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSI
DGRW

Technology

98.4%
32.1%

Industrials

1.6%
9.9%

Basic Materials

-

3.3%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.7%

Energy

-

5.0%

Financial Services

-

11.3%

Healthcare

-

12.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.2%

Technology

PSI
98.4%
DGRW
32.1%

Industrials

PSI
1.6%
DGRW
9.9%

Basic Materials

PSI

-

DGRW
3.3%

Communication Services

PSI

-

DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PSI

-

DGRW
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

PSI

-

DGRW
6.7%

Energy

PSI

-

DGRW
5.0%

Financial Services

PSI

-

DGRW
11.3%

Healthcare

PSI

-

DGRW
12.8%

Real Estate

PSI

-

DGRW

-

Utilities

PSI

-

DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSI vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSI
PSI Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSI vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSIDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.32

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.90

2.15

+10.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.29

9.28

+36.01

PSI vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSI Sharpe Ratio is 4.92, which is higher than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSI and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSI vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSIDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.96%

-32.04%

-30.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.48%

-8.30%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.07%

-16.21%

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.85%

-17.27%

-27.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.85%

-32.04%

-12.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.93%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.92%

-3.01%

-12.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

1.92%

+2.48%

Volatility

PSI vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 18.89% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.41%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSIDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.89%

3.41%

+15.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.67%

8.04%

+25.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.58%

10.16%

+30.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.44%

14.01%

+24.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.42%

16.23%

+19.19%

PSI vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSI vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
0.04%0.10%0.15%0.40%0.61%0.14%0.21%0.52%0.83%0.21%0.68%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSI and DGRW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSI has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to DGRW (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.59% vs 14.13% for DGRW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 14.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.

PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while DGRW is Dividend. PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.28% for DGRW.

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSI and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer