PSFM vs. GCOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).
PSFM and GCOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSFM is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Mar 31, 2021. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016.
Performance
PSFM vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSFM vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFM Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF | 1.90% | 7.28% | 14.18% | 18.32% | -5.23% | 11.65% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.89% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 5.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFM achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.89% return.
PSFM
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 13.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 30.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSFM vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFM has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSFM vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
PSFM
GCOW
PSFM vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFM | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 2.21 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 2.94 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.80 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.90 | 14.21 | -3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFM | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 2.21 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.60 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFM and GCOW is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PSFM vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
PSFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFM Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.41% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
PSFM vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFM drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFM and GCOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFM | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.33% | -37.64% | +23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.58% | -10.79% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.11% | +2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -5.90% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 2.18% | -0.90% |
Volatility
PSFM vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) is 1.70%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that PSFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSFM | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 3.45% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 7.89% | -5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 13.89% | -2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.65% | 13.48% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.65% | 16.24% | -5.59% |