PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFD vs. ICOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSFD vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 18.10% return.


PSFD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.33%
YTD
6.69%
6M
7.90%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*

ICOW

1D
0.09%
1M
2.70%
YTD
18.10%
6M
19.83%
1Y
39.21%
3Y*
20.43%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFD vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSFD
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF
6.69%12.93%14.54%20.95%-3.06%18.23%1.33%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
18.10%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFD and ICOW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.62

The correlation between PSFD and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSFD vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSFD
ICOW

Technology

36.2%
6.2%

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
7.1%

Industrials

8.1%
28.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
8.5%

Energy

3.5%
23.7%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
5.4%

Technology

PSFD
36.2%
ICOW
6.2%

Financial Services

PSFD
11.9%
ICOW

-

Communication Services

PSFD
10.9%
ICOW
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PSFD
10.1%
ICOW
11.6%

Healthcare

PSFD
8.4%
ICOW
7.1%

Industrials

PSFD
8.1%
ICOW
28.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSFD
4.9%
ICOW
8.5%

Energy

PSFD
3.5%
ICOW
23.7%

Utilities

PSFD
2.3%
ICOW

-

Real Estate

PSFD
1.9%
ICOW

-

Basic Materials

PSFD
1.8%
ICOW
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSFD vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFD
PSFD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFD vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFDICOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.72

2.87

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.01

3.73

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.51

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

5.13

-1.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.43

18.38

-1.95

PSFD vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFD and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFDICOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

2.87

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.63

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.55

+0.69

Drawdowns

PSFD vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and ICOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFDICOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-43.49%

+28.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

-8.02%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.26%

-14.81%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.94%

-28.48%

+13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-7.59%

+5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

2.24%

-1.09%

Volatility

PSFD vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) is 1.16%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that PSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFDICOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

4.61%

-3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

10.56%

-4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

13.77%

-6.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

16.64%

-6.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.43%

18.47%

-8.04%

PSFD vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSFD vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.10%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%
PSFD
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSFD and ICOW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICOW has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to PSFD (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFD dropped -14.94% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

On 5-year performance, PSFD leads with 11.94% vs 10.39% for ICOW. On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, PSFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSFD has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFD.

ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for PSFD.

PSFD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFD and 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSFD and ICOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer