PSFD vs. ICOW
PSFD (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. PSFD is actively managed, while ICOW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSFD returned 11.94%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for ICOW. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
PSFD vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 18.10% return.
PSFD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 6.69%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 18.10%
- 6M
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- 39.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
PSFD vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF | 6.69% | 12.93% | 14.54% | 20.95% | -3.06% | 18.23% | 1.33% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 18.10% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFD and ICOW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PSFD and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSFD vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSFD
ICOW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
PSFD
ICOW
Financial Services
PSFD
ICOW
-
Communication Services
PSFD
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
PSFD
ICOW
Healthcare
PSFD
ICOW
Industrials
PSFD
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
PSFD
ICOW
Energy
PSFD
ICOW
Utilities
PSFD
ICOW
-
Real Estate
PSFD
ICOW
-
Basic Materials
PSFD
ICOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFD vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
PSFD
ICOW
PSFD vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFD | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 2.87 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.01 | 3.73 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.51 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 5.13 | -1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.43 | 18.38 | -1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFD | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.87 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 0.63 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.55 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
PSFD vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFD | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.94% | -43.49% | +28.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -8.02% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.26% | -14.81% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.94% | -28.48% | +13.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -7.59% | +5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 2.24% | -1.09% |
Volatility
PSFD vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) is 1.16%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that PSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFD | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 4.61% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.61% | 10.56% | -4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.80% | 13.77% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 16.64% | -6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 18.47% | -8.04% |
PSFD vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFD vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.10% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFD and ICOW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOW has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to PSFD (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFD dropped -14.94% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, PSFD leads with 11.94% vs 10.39% for ICOW. On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, PSFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSFD has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFD.
ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for PSFD.
PSFD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFD and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSFD and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer