PSET vs. PY
PSET (Principal Quality ETF) and PY (Principal Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSET is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Price Setters, while PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal. PSET is passively managed, while PY is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSET returned 12.82%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for PY. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
PSET vs. PY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than PY's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PSET has outperformed PY with an annualized return of 12.82%, while PY has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.
PSET
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
PY
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
PSET vs. PY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.31% | 7.27% | 17.65% | 24.07% | -16.52% | 29.59% | 16.20% | 34.85% | -2.29% | 24.63% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 4.93% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 2.71% | 26.87% | -13.34% | 18.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSET and PY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PSET and PY shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSET vs. PY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSET
PY
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PSET
PY
Industrials
PSET
PY
Financial Services
PSET
PY
Healthcare
PSET
PY
Communication Services
PSET
PY
Consumer Cyclical
PSET
PY
Basic Materials
PSET
PY
Energy
PSET
PY
Consumer Defensive
PSET
PY
Real Estate
PSET
-
PY
Utilities
PSET
-
PY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSET vs. PY — Risk / Return Rank
PSET
PY
PSET vs. PY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Principal Value ETF (PY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSET | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.27 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.52 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 8.46 | -6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSET | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.49 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.48 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.54 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.54 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
PSET vs. PY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum PY drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and PY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSET | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -45.44% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -6.20% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.96% | -17.84% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -17.84% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.74% | -45.44% | +10.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -0.24% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -5.05% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 1.85% | +1.97% |
Volatility
PSET vs. PY - Volatility Comparison
Principal Quality ETF (PSET) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Principal Value ETF (PY) at 2.30%. This indicates that PSET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSET | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 2.30% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 7.32% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 10.52% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 15.77% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 20.07% | -2.02% |
PSET vs. PY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSET and PY have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PSET vs. PY - Dividend Comparison
PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than PY's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.62% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 1.47% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.26% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.11% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSET and PY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSET has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to PY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs PY's -45.44%.
On 10-year performance, PSET leads with 12.82% vs 10.73% for PY. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSET has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSET and PY have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.62% for PSET.
PSET is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PY is Large Cap Value Equities.
PY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSET and PY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer