PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSET vs. PY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSET vs. PY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Principal Value ETF (PY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than PY's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PSET has outperformed PY with an annualized return of 12.82%, while PY has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.


PSET

1D
0.80%
1M
2.98%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.01%
1Y
8.25%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
12.82%

PY

1D
0.76%
1M
1.76%
YTD
4.93%
6M
5.16%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSET vs. PY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.31%7.27%17.65%24.07%-16.52%29.59%16.20%34.85%-2.29%24.63%
PY
Principal Value ETF
4.93%7.74%16.79%9.11%-5.10%34.83%2.71%26.87%-13.34%18.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PSET and PY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.58

The correlation between PSET and PY shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSET vs. PY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSET
PY

Technology

37.9%
25.0%

Industrials

19.1%
9.3%

Financial Services

14.3%
16.5%

Healthcare

10.8%
12.0%

Communication Services

6.7%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
11.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.2%

Energy

1.4%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
11.5%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Technology

PSET
37.9%
PY
25.0%

Industrials

PSET
19.1%
PY
9.3%

Financial Services

PSET
14.3%
PY
16.5%

Healthcare

PSET
10.8%
PY
12.0%

Communication Services

PSET
6.7%
PY
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PSET
5.4%
PY
11.0%

Basic Materials

PSET
3.3%
PY
1.2%

Energy

PSET
1.4%
PY
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

PSET
1.1%
PY
11.5%

Real Estate

PSET

-

PY
1.1%

Utilities

PSET

-

PY
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSET vs. PY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSET
PSET Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PSET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSET Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PSET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSET Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PY
PY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSET vs. PY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Principal Value ETF (PY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSETPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.27

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

2.52

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

8.46

-6.30

PSET vs. PY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSET Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the PY Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSET and PY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSETPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.49

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.48

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.54

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.54

+0.18

Drawdowns

PSET vs. PY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum PY drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and PY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSETPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-45.44%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-6.20%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.96%

-17.84%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-17.84%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

-45.44%

+10.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-0.24%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-5.05%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

1.85%

+1.97%

Volatility

PSET vs. PY - Volatility Comparison

Principal Quality ETF (PSET) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Principal Value ETF (PY) at 2.30%. This indicates that PSET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSETPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.30%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

7.32%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

10.52%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

15.77%

+1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

20.07%

-2.02%

PSET vs. PY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PSET and PY have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSET vs. PY - Dividend Comparison

PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than PY's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.62%0.59%0.69%0.85%1.47%0.89%1.09%1.52%1.33%1.02%1.26%
PY
Principal Value ETF
2.11%2.14%2.22%2.68%3.02%2.83%2.95%2.25%2.34%1.68%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSET and PY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSET has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to PY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs PY's -45.44%.

On 10-year performance, PSET leads with 12.82% vs 10.73% for PY. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSET has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSET and PY have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.62% for PSET.

PSET is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PY is Large Cap Value Equities.

PY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSET and PY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer