PSET vs. FDRR
PSET (Principal Quality ETF) and FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) are both exchange-traded funds - PSET is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Price Setters, while FDRR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSET returned 8.13%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for FDRR. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
PSET vs. FDRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than FDRR's 7.30% return.
PSET
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 6M
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
FDRR
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 24.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
PSET vs. FDRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | -2.15% | 7.27% | 17.65% | 24.07% | -16.52% | 29.59% | 16.20% | 34.85% | -2.29% | 24.63% |
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 7.30% | 21.70% | 20.24% | 13.66% | -9.73% | 26.06% | 8.23% | 26.86% | -3.60% | 19.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSET and FDRR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PSET and FDRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSET vs. FDRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSET
FDRR
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PSET
FDRR
Industrials
PSET
FDRR
Financial Services
PSET
FDRR
Healthcare
PSET
FDRR
Communication Services
PSET
FDRR
Consumer Cyclical
PSET
FDRR
Basic Materials
PSET
FDRR
Energy
PSET
FDRR
Consumer Defensive
PSET
FDRR
Real Estate
PSET
-
FDRR
Utilities
PSET
-
FDRR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSET vs. FDRR — Risk / Return Rank
PSET
FDRR
PSET vs. FDRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSET | FDRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.40 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 2.93 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 11.93 | -10.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSET vs. FDRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, roughly equal to the maximum FDRR drawdown of -36.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and FDRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSET | FDRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -36.52% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -8.52% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.96% | -18.04% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -20.92% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -3.59% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -3.99% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 2.09% | +1.82% |
Volatility
PSET vs. FDRR - Volatility Comparison
Principal Quality ETF (PSET) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) at 3.69%. This indicates that PSET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSET | FDRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 3.69% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 8.70% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 11.24% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 15.02% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 16.86% | +1.24% |
PSET vs. FDRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSET and FDRR have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PSET vs. FDRR - Dividend Comparison
PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FDRR's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 2.18% | 2.21% | 2.61% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.09% | 2.85% | 2.89% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 0.61% |
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.64% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 1.47% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSET and FDRR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSET has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to FDRR (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs FDRR's -36.52%.
On 5-year performance, FDRR leads with 11.85% vs 8.13% for PSET. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, FDRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDRR has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSET and FDRR have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.64% for PSET.
PSET is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDRR is Large Cap Blend Equities. PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Fidelity.
FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSET and FDRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer