PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSET vs. FDRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSET vs. FDRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than FDRR's 10.61% return.


PSET

1D
0.80%
1M
2.98%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.01%
1Y
8.25%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
12.82%

FDRR

1D
0.55%
1M
6.02%
YTD
10.61%
6M
10.78%
1Y
31.90%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSET vs. FDRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.31%7.27%17.65%24.07%-16.52%29.59%16.20%34.85%-2.29%24.63%
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
10.61%21.70%20.24%13.66%-9.73%26.06%8.23%26.86%-3.60%19.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PSET and FDRR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.69

The correlation between PSET and FDRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSET vs. FDRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSET
FDRR

Technology

37.9%
34.5%

Industrials

19.1%
8.7%

Financial Services

14.3%
12.0%

Healthcare

10.8%
9.4%

Communication Services

6.7%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
8.7%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.2%

Energy

1.4%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
4.8%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

PSET
37.9%
FDRR
34.5%

Industrials

PSET
19.1%
FDRR
8.7%

Financial Services

PSET
14.3%
FDRR
12.0%

Healthcare

PSET
10.8%
FDRR
9.4%

Communication Services

PSET
6.7%
FDRR
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PSET
5.4%
FDRR
8.7%

Basic Materials

PSET
3.3%
FDRR
2.2%

Energy

PSET
1.4%
FDRR
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

PSET
1.1%
FDRR
4.8%

Real Estate

PSET

-

FDRR
2.9%

Utilities

PSET

-

FDRR
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSET vs. FDRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSET
PSET Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PSET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSET Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PSET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSET Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FDRR
FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSET vs. FDRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSETFDRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.53

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.76

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

16.02

-13.86

PSET vs. FDRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSET Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the FDRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSET and FDRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSETFDRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

2.91

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.84

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.82

-0.10

Drawdowns

PSET vs. FDRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, roughly equal to the maximum FDRR drawdown of -36.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and FDRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSETFDRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-36.52%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-8.52%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.96%

-18.04%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-20.92%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-0.61%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-4.00%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

2.00%

+1.82%

Volatility

PSET vs. FDRR - Volatility Comparison

Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) have volatilities of 3.06% and 3.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSETFDRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.03%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

8.32%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

11.02%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

15.00%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

16.87%

+1.18%

PSET vs. FDRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FDRR's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSET vs. FDRR - Dividend Comparison

PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than FDRR's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
2.08%2.21%2.61%2.93%2.75%2.09%2.85%2.89%3.20%2.89%0.61%
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.62%0.59%0.69%0.85%1.47%0.89%1.09%1.52%1.33%1.02%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSET and FDRR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSET has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to FDRR (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs FDRR's -36.52%.

On 5-year performance, FDRR leads with 12.47% vs 9.03% for PSET. On fees, PSET is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDRR has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSET is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDRR.

FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.62% for PSET.

PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.29% for FDRR.

FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSET and FDRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer