PSEP vs. PMAR
PSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September) and PMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PSEP tracks the S&P 500 Index while PMAR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSEP returned 9.24%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for PMAR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PSEP vs. PMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSEP achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than PMAR's 5.38% return.
PSEP
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 4.35%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 14.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- —
PMAR
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 14.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- —
PSEP vs. PMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September | 4.35% | 11.85% | 12.44% | 18.84% | -3.74% | 8.85% | 9.69% |
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March | 5.38% | 11.82% | 12.83% | 15.95% | -2.65% | 10.96% | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSEP and PMAR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PSEP and PMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSEP vs. PMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSEP
PMAR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSEP
PMAR
Financial Services
PSEP
PMAR
Communication Services
PSEP
PMAR
Consumer Cyclical
PSEP
PMAR
Healthcare
PSEP
PMAR
Industrials
PSEP
PMAR
Consumer Defensive
PSEP
PMAR
Energy
PSEP
PMAR
Utilities
PSEP
PMAR
Real Estate
PSEP
PMAR
Basic Materials
PSEP
PMAR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSEP vs. PMAR — Risk / Return Rank
PSEP
PMAR
PSEP vs. PMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSEP | PMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.62 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 3.58 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.88 | 21.14 | -2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSEP | PMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.75 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 1.15 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.90 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
PSEP vs. PMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSEP drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, roughly equal to the maximum PMAR drawdown of -17.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSEP and PMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSEP | PMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -17.18% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -4.11% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.92% | -9.32% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.92% | -10.84% | +0.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.92% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -1.56% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.70% | +0.07% |
Volatility
PSEP vs. PMAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) is 0.91%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that PSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSEP | PMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 1.15% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.30% | 4.24% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.74% | 5.37% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.61% | 8.18% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.12% | 10.72% | -0.60% |
PSEP vs. PMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSEP and PMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PSEP vs. PMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSEP nor PMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, PSEP and PMAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PMAR has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to PSEP (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSEP dropped -17.90% vs PMAR's -17.18%.
On 5-year performance, PMAR leads with 9.33% vs 9.24% for PSEP. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PMAR has performed better with a 9.33% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSEP and PMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PSEP and PMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PSEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while PMAR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index.
PMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSEP and PMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer