PSEP vs. LQDH
PSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSEP is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while LQDH is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. PSEP is passively managed, while LQDH is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSEP returned 9.42%/yr vs 5.32%/yr for LQDH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSEP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
PSEP vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSEP achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly higher than LQDH's 2.40% return.
PSEP
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 15.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 3.24%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.65%
PSEP vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September | 4.99% | 11.85% | 12.44% | 18.84% | -3.74% | 8.85% | 8.48% | 4.62% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.40% | 7.00% | 7.43% | 11.14% | -1.88% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 5.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSEP and LQDH is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between PSEP and LQDH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSEP vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
PSEP
LQDH
PSEP vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSEP | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.68 | 2.90 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.95 | 4.40 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.58 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.47 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.09 | 14.76 | +5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSEP | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.90 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 1.21 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.59 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
PSEP vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSEP drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSEP and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSEP | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -24.63% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -2.34% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.92% | -4.86% | -5.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.92% | -7.08% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -1.68% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.55% | +0.22% |
Volatility
PSEP vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) at 0.48%. This indicates that PSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSEP | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 0.48% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.25% | 2.03% | +2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.71% | 2.72% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.61% | 4.41% | +4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.12% | 6.44% | +3.68% |
PSEP vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSEP vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
PSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 6.47% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
PSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSEP and LQDH have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSEP has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to LQDH (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSEP dropped -17.90% vs LQDH's -24.63%.
On 5-year performance, PSEP leads with 9.42% vs 5.32% for LQDH. On fees, LQDH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LQDH has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSEP has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 5.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LQDH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PSEP.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 0.00% for PSEP.
PSEP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LQDH is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PSEP and 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSEP and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer