PSDSX vs. FCNVX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PSDSX (Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund) and FCNVX (Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PSDSX returned 2.71%/yr vs 3.66%/yr for FCNVX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSDSX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FCNVX.

Performance

PSDSX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund (PSDSX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSDSX achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than FCNVX's 1.82% return.

PSDSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 1.04%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 1Y: 3.33%
• 3Y*: 4.12%
• 5Y*: 2.71%
• 10Y*: —

FCNVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 1.82%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 1Y: 4.09%
• 3Y*: 5.00%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 2.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSDSX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSDSX Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund	1.19%	3.67%	4.43%	4.69%	-0.28%	0.05%	1.59%	3.00%	1.84%	1.51%
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	1.82%	4.51%	5.43%	5.86%	0.85%	-0.06%	1.10%	3.00%	1.82%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PSDSX and FCNVX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between PSDSX and FCNVX has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PSDSX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSDSX

PSDSX Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PSDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PSDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PSDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PSDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FCNVX

FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 100
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSDSX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund (PSDSX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSDSX	FCNVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.87	3.49	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.31	20.15	-15.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.08	10.62	-6.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.73	41.30	-36.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.36	134.81	-112.45

PSDSX vs. FCNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSDSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is comparable to the FCNVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSDSX and FCNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSDSX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSDSX drawdown since its inception was -3.03%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSDSX and FCNVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSDSX	FCNVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.03%	-2.19%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.80%	-0.10%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.29%	-0.30%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.52%	-0.59%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-2.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.19%	-0.05%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.16%	0.03%	+0.13%

Volatility

PSDSX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund (PSDSX) is 0.10%, while Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) has a volatility of 0.37%. This indicates that PSDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSDSX	FCNVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.10%	0.37%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.88%	0.80%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98%	1.18%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.35%	1.30%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.08%	1.05%	+0.03%

PSDSX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSDSX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSDSX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison

PSDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than FCNVX's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	4.10%	4.41%	5.17%	4.97%	1.24%	0.24%	0.99%	2.45%	2.21%	1.30%	1.01%	0.48%
PSDSX Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund	3.50%	3.57%	4.06%	3.57%	1.70%	0.50%	1.21%	2.51%	2.18%	1.50%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSDSX and FCNVX in my portfolio?

PSDSX and FCNVX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSDSX or FCNVX?

FCNVX has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to PSDSX (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSDSX dropped -3.03% vs FCNVX's -2.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 3.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.