PSDSX vs. PRTBX
PSDSX (Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund) and PRTBX (Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PSDSX returned 2.68%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for PRTBX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSDSX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PRTBX.
Performance
PSDSX vs. PRTBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSDSX achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than PRTBX's 0.78% return.
PSDSX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- —
PRTBX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- 1.26%
PSDSX vs. PRTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSDSX Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund | 1.01% | 3.67% | 4.43% | 4.69% | -0.28% | 0.05% | 1.59% | 3.00% | 1.84% | 1.51% |
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio | 0.78% | 4.19% | 4.12% | 3.79% | -2.28% | -0.74% | 0.10% | 1.76% | 1.16% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSDSX and PRTBX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.32 |
The correlation between PSDSX and PRTBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSDSX vs. PRTBX — Risk / Return Rank
PSDSX
PRTBX
PSDSX vs. PRTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund (PSDSX) and Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSDSX | PRTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.15 | 2.20 | +1.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 9.53 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.84 | 46.49 | -23.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSDSX vs. PRTBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSDSX drawdown since its inception was -3.03%, smaller than the maximum PRTBX drawdown of -5.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSDSX and PRTBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSDSX | PRTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -5.13% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.80% | -0.32% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.29% | -0.44% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.52% | -3.66% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -0.96% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | 0.07% | +0.09% |
Volatility
PSDSX vs. PRTBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund (PSDSX) is 0.13%, while Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) has a volatility of 0.22%. This indicates that PSDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSDSX | PRTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.13% | 0.22% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.89% | 0.43% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98% | 0.67% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 1.21% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.08% | 0.87% | +0.21% |
PSDSX vs. PRTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSDSX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than PRTBX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSDSX vs. PRTBX - Dividend Comparison
PSDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than PRTBX's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio | 3.36% | 3.39% | 2.69% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 1.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
PSDSX Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund | 3.54% | 3.57% | 4.06% | 3.57% | 1.70% | 0.50% | 1.21% | 2.51% | 2.18% | 1.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSDSX and PRTBX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRTBX has higher volatility (0.22%) compared to PSDSX (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSDSX dropped -3.03% vs PRTBX's -5.13%.
PRTBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 3.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSDSX and PRTBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer