PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCU vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCU vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCU achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCU has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 5.81%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


PSCU

1D
-2.32%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
12.29%
6M
10.22%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
5.81%

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCU vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
12.29%-1.93%10.68%2.12%-19.73%30.12%3.80%9.67%-4.80%12.42%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCU and RSP is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.64

The correlation between PSCU and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCU vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCU
RSP

Communication Services

56.7%
3.7%

Utilities

31.9%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
9.9%

Industrials

3.6%
14.1%

Real Estate

2.0%
6.0%

Technology

1.6%
19.6%

Financial Services

0.0%
14.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.5%

Energy

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

11.0%

Communication Services

PSCU
56.7%
RSP
3.7%

Utilities

PSCU
31.9%
RSP
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCU
4.1%
RSP
9.9%

Industrials

PSCU
3.6%
RSP
14.1%

Real Estate

PSCU
2.0%
RSP
6.0%

Technology

PSCU
1.6%
RSP
19.6%

Financial Services

PSCU
0.0%
RSP
14.5%

Basic Materials

PSCU

-

RSP
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

PSCU

-

RSP
6.5%

Energy

PSCU

-

RSP
4.5%

Healthcare

PSCU

-

RSP
11.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCU vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCU
PSCU Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PSCU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCU vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCURSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.49

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

9.48

-3.83

PSCU vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCU Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCU and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCURSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.70

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.52

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.65

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.57

-0.09

Drawdowns

PSCU vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCU drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCU and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCURSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.97%

-59.92%

+29.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-7.85%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

-17.81%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-21.38%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

-39.04%

+9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-0.38%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-6.65%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.06%

+1.22%

Volatility

PSCU vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that PSCU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCURSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

2.56%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

8.29%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

11.56%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

16.18%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

18.35%

+1.12%

PSCU vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCU has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCU vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

PSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
0.99%1.10%0.98%1.60%1.71%2.69%1.20%2.47%2.35%1.84%6.93%2.94%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCU and RSP have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCU has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCU dropped -29.97% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.86% vs 5.81% for PSCU. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCU.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.99% for PSCU.

PSCU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. PSCU tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Utilities & Communication Services Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCU and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCU and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer