PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCU vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCU vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCU achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCU has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.24%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


PSCU

1D
-0.57%
1M
-2.09%
6M
8.75%
YTD
11.84%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
5.24%
ALL TIME*
8.57%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$42.89K$70.43K$77.81K
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

PSCU vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
11.84%-1.93%10.68%2.12%-19.73%30.12%3.80%9.67%-4.80%12.42%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCU and VOO is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.59

The correlation between PSCU and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCU vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCU
VOO

Communication Services

57.1%
9.9%

Utilities

32.3%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
9.5%

Industrials

3.7%
8.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.8%

Technology

0.8%
38.6%

Financial Services

0.0%
11.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.0%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Communication Services

PSCU
57.1%
VOO
9.9%

Utilities

PSCU
32.3%
VOO
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCU
4.1%
VOO
9.5%

Industrials

PSCU
3.7%
VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

PSCU
2.0%
VOO
1.8%

Technology

PSCU
0.8%
VOO
38.6%

Financial Services

PSCU
0.0%
VOO
11.4%

Basic Materials

PSCU

-

VOO
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSCU

-

VOO
4.5%

Energy

PSCU

-

VOO
3.0%

Healthcare

PSCU

-

VOO
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCU vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSCU
PSCU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PSCU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSCU vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCUVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.21

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

9.44

-4.52

PSCU vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCU Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCU and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCU vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCU drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCU and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCUVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.97%

-33.99%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-8.90%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

-18.69%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-24.52%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

-33.99%

+4.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-1.38%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-3.67%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.08%

+1.24%

Volatility

PSCU vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) is 2.99%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that PSCU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCUVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.54%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

10.10%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

12.82%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

16.93%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

18.01%

+1.49%

PSCU vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCU has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCU vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
0.99%1.10%0.98%1.60%1.71%2.69%1.20%2.47%2.35%1.84%6.93%2.94%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCU and VOO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to PSCU (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCU dropped -29.97% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.14% vs 5.24% for PSCU. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PSCU has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCU.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.99% for PSCU.

PSCU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. PSCU tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Utilities & Communication Services Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCU and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCU and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer