PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCU vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCU vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCU achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.88% return.


PSCU

1D
-2.32%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
12.29%
6M
10.22%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
5.81%

PAVE

1D
0.70%
1M
1.96%
YTD
19.88%
6M
18.87%
1Y
37.15%
3Y*
26.78%
5Y*
17.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCU vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
12.29%-1.93%10.68%2.12%-19.73%30.12%3.80%9.67%-4.80%16.74%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
19.88%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%14.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCU and PAVE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.61

The correlation between PSCU and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSCU vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCU
PAVE

Communication Services

56.7%

-

Utilities

31.9%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%

-

Industrials

3.6%
74.8%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

1.6%
1.1%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

20.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Energy

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Communication Services

PSCU
56.7%
PAVE

-

Utilities

PSCU
31.9%
PAVE
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCU
4.1%
PAVE

-

Industrials

PSCU
3.6%
PAVE
74.8%

Real Estate

PSCU
2.0%
PAVE

-

Technology

PSCU
1.6%
PAVE
1.1%

Financial Services

PSCU
0.0%
PAVE

-

Basic Materials

PSCU

-

PAVE
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

PSCU

-

PAVE
0.3%

Energy

PSCU

-

PAVE
0.2%

Healthcare

PSCU

-

PAVE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCU vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCU
PSCU Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PSCU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCU vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCUPAVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.13

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

11.50

-5.86

PSCU vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCU Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCU and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCUPAVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.99

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.81

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.68

-0.21

Drawdowns

PSCU vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCU drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCU and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCUPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.97%

-44.08%

+14.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-11.91%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

-26.23%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-26.23%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-1.82%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-6.24%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.24%

+0.04%

Volatility

PSCU vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) is 5.04%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that PSCU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCUPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

6.42%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

15.17%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

18.84%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

21.60%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

24.38%

-4.91%

PSCU vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCU has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCU vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

PSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.77%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%0.00%0.00%
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
0.99%1.10%0.98%1.60%1.71%2.69%1.20%2.47%2.35%1.84%6.93%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCU and PAVE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAVE has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to PSCU (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCU dropped -29.97% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs 0.96% for PSCU. On fees, PSCU is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCU has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 0.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCU is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.

PSCU has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.

PSCU tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Utilities & Communication Services Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCU and 0.47% for PAVE.

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCU and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer