PSCT vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSCT (Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCT returned 16.70%/yr vs 17.27%/yr for XLG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCT charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

PSCT vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCT achieves a 54.18% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 7.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSCT having a 16.70% annualized return and XLG not far ahead at 17.27%.

PSCT

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 15.45%
• YTD: 54.18%
• 6M: 50.59%
• 1Y: 98.87%
• 3Y*: 23.44%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 16.70%

XLG

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCT vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF	54.18%	18.63%	-1.06%	20.81%	-22.50%	26.26%	27.79%	39.38%	-9.34%	9.96%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	7.57%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCT and XLG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010	0.73

The correlation between PSCT and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCT vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCT	XLG
Technology	85.2%	43.9%
Industrials	5.1%	1.9%
Energy	5.0%	2.7%
Financial Services	3.7%	9.6%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Communication Services	-	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PSCT vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCT

PSCT Risk / Return Rank: 89
PSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 56
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCT vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCT	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	2.15	+1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	2.92	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.38	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.72	2.31	+4.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.34	8.66	+19.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSCT vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCT Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCT and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCT	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35	2.15	+1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.87	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.92	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.62	0.00

Drawdowns

PSCT vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCT drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCT and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCT	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.44%	-52.39%	+11.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.80%	-12.41%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.96%	-20.70%	-13.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.80%	-28.02%	-6.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	-30.46%	-9.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-1.44%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-7.64%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	3.30%	+0.20%

Volatility

PSCT vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 3.19%. This indicates that PSCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCT	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.00%	3.19%	+5.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.05%	9.80%	+11.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.82%	13.33%	+16.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.68%	18.68%	+9.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.67%	18.84%	+7.83%

PSCT vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCT vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

PSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.01%	0.02%	0.00%	0.01%	0.08%	0.22%	0.47%	0.19%	0.25%	0.15%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCT and XLG in my portfolio?

PSCT and XLG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCT or XLG?

PSCT has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCT dropped -40.44% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, PSCT or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.27% vs 16.70% for PSCT. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCT or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.27% return vs 16.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCT or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCT or XLG?

XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.01% for PSCT.

What is the main difference between PSCT and XLG?

PSCT is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. PSCT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCT and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.