PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCT vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCT vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCT achieves a 54.18% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCT has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 16.70%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.


PSCT

1D
-1.18%
1M
15.45%
YTD
54.18%
6M
50.59%
1Y
98.87%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
16.70%

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCT vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
54.18%18.63%-1.06%20.81%-22.50%26.26%27.79%39.38%-9.34%9.96%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCT and RSP is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.80

The correlation between PSCT and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCT vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCT
RSP

Technology

85.2%
19.6%

Industrials

5.1%
14.1%

Energy

5.0%
4.5%

Financial Services

3.7%
14.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Communication Services

-

3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.5%

Healthcare

-

11.0%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Technology

PSCT
85.2%
RSP
19.6%

Industrials

PSCT
5.1%
RSP
14.1%

Energy

PSCT
5.0%
RSP
4.5%

Financial Services

PSCT
3.7%
RSP
14.5%

Basic Materials

PSCT

-

RSP
4.1%

Communication Services

PSCT

-

RSP
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCT

-

RSP
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

PSCT

-

RSP
6.5%

Healthcare

PSCT

-

RSP
11.0%

Real Estate

PSCT

-

RSP
6.0%

Utilities

PSCT

-

RSP
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCT vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCT
PSCT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCT vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCTRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.30

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.72

2.49

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.34

9.48

+18.86

PSCT vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCT Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCT and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCTRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

1.70

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.52

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.65

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.57

+0.06

Drawdowns

PSCT vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCT drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCT and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCTRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.44%

-59.92%

+19.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-7.85%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.96%

-17.81%

-16.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

-21.38%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-39.04%

-1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.38%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-6.65%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.06%

+1.44%

Volatility

PSCT vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that PSCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCTRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

2.56%

+6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.05%

8.29%

+12.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.82%

11.56%

+18.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.68%

16.18%

+11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.67%

18.35%

+8.32%

PSCT vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCT vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

PSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
0.01%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.01%0.08%0.22%0.47%0.19%0.25%0.15%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCT and RSP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCT has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCT dropped -40.44% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, PSCT leads with 16.70% vs 11.86% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSCT has performed better with a 16.70% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCT.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.01% for PSCT.

PSCT is categorized as Technology Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. PSCT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCT and 0.20% for RSP.

PSCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCT and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer