PSCSX vs. GQSCX
PSCSX (PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund) and GQSCX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PSCSX returned 6.13%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for GQSCX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PSCSX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GQSCX.
Performance
PSCSX vs. GQSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCSX achieves a 18.66% return, which is significantly lower than GQSCX's 26.14% return.
PSCSX
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- YTD
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 35.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.47%
GQSCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- YTD
- 26.14%
- 1Y
- 53.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PSCSX vs. GQSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCSX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | 18.66% | 12.57% | 12.60% | 17.09% | -23.95% | 14.15% | 19.50% | 30.55% | -12.05% | 1.18% |
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio | 26.14% | 12.22% | 11.49% | 18.94% | -8.48% | 31.77% | 7.60% | 22.17% | -11.32% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCSX and GQSCX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PSCSX and GQSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCSX vs. GQSCX — Risk / Return Rank
PSCSX
GQSCX
PSCSX vs. GQSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCSX | GQSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 5.63 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 21.36 | -11.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCSX vs. GQSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCSX drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, which is greater than GQSCX's maximum drawdown of -46.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCSX and GQSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCSX | GQSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.02% | -46.87% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -8.74% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -28.83% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.03% | -28.83% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -0.97% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.15% | -8.03% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 2.32% | +1.09% |
Volatility
PSCSX vs. GQSCX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) at 3.29%. This indicates that PSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCSX | GQSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 3.29% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 12.54% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.67% | 18.10% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 21.75% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 24.66% | -0.45% |
PSCSX vs. GQSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than GQSCX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCSX vs. GQSCX - Dividend Comparison
PSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than GQSCX's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio | 2.62% | 3.01% | 10.53% | 0.70% | 9.45% | 10.41% | 0.51% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCSX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | 3.61% | 5.63% | 4.34% | 2.36% | 26.32% | 19.21% | 5.69% | 8.77% | 12.86% | 5.84% | 3.41% | 8.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCSX and GQSCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCSX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to GQSCX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCSX dropped -58.02% vs GQSCX's -46.87%.
GQSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCSX and GQSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer