PSCM vs. FMAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSCM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF) and FMAT (Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF) are both Materials funds - PSCM tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC while FMAT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCM returned 12.90%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for FMAT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FMAT.

Performance

PSCM vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCM achieves a 26.28% return, which is significantly higher than FMAT's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCM has outperformed FMAT with an annualized return of 12.90%, while FMAT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.33% annualized return.

PSCM

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: -0.62%
• YTD: 26.28%
• 6M: 30.79%
• 1Y: 62.19%
• 3Y*: 18.02%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: 12.90%

FMAT

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 10.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCM vs. FMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF	26.28%	15.59%	0.67%	19.86%	-6.45%	18.02%	22.18%	21.75%	-23.28%	10.37%
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	13.04%	12.11%	0.47%	13.71%	-11.54%	27.45%	19.57%	23.35%	-17.40%	23.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCM and FMAT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.79

The correlation between PSCM and FMAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCM vs. FMAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCM	FMAT
Basic Materials	91.2%	90.1%
Energy	7.0%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	8.3%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	0.5%
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PSCM vs. FMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCM

PSCM Risk / Return Rank: 78
PSCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PSCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PSCM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PSCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PSCM Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FMAT

FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 34
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCM vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCM	FMAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	1.28	+1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	1.85	+1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.22	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	1.68	+2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.51	5.51	+11.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSCM vs. FMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCM Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the FMAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCM and FMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCM	FMAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	1.28	+1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.30	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.49	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.45	-0.05

Drawdowns

PSCM vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCM drawdown since its inception was -51.34%, which is greater than FMAT's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCM and FMAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCM	FMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.34%	-41.11%	-10.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.33%	-13.48%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.36%	-23.17%	-12.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.36%	-25.40%	-9.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.34%	-41.11%	-10.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.73%	-3.97%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.90%	-6.87%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	4.09%	-0.31%

Volatility

PSCM vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) at 6.14%. This indicates that PSCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCM	FMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.72%	6.14%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.84%	13.95%	+2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.03%	17.66%	+6.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.74%	19.60%	+6.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.91%	21.19%	+5.72%

PSCM vs. FMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAT's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCM vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison

PSCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than FMAT's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	1.42%	1.64%	1.68%	1.71%	2.00%	1.44%	1.73%	1.89%	2.18%	1.53%	1.78%	2.16%
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF	1.02%	1.17%	0.80%	0.81%	0.93%	0.67%	1.56%	1.14%	1.25%	0.61%	0.76%	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCM and FMAT in my portfolio?

PSCM and FMAT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCM or FMAT?

PSCM has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to FMAT (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCM dropped -51.34% vs FMAT's -41.11%.

Which ETF is better, PSCM or FMAT?

On 10-year performance, PSCM leads with 12.90% vs 10.33% for FMAT. On fees, FMAT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FMAT has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCM or FMAT?

Over the 10-year period, PSCM has performed better with a 12.90% return vs 10.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCM or FMAT?

FMAT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCM or FMAT?

FMAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.02% for PSCM.

What is the main difference between PSCM and FMAT?

PSCM tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC, while FMAT tracks MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCM and 0.08% for FMAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.