PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCM vs. PSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCM vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCM achieves a 26.28% return, which is significantly higher than PSCC's 5.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCM has outperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 12.90%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.


PSCM

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
26.28%
6M
30.79%
1Y
62.19%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
12.90%

PSCC

1D
-0.25%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
5.02%
6M
3.53%
1Y
-5.46%
3Y*
-1.89%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCM vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
26.28%15.59%0.67%19.86%-6.45%18.02%22.18%21.75%-23.28%10.37%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
5.02%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCM and PSCC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.56

The correlation between PSCM and PSCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSCM vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCM
PSCC

Basic Materials

91.2%
3.8%

Energy

7.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
2.9%

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

90.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

3.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

PSCM
91.2%
PSCC
3.8%

Energy

PSCM
7.0%
PSCC

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSCM
1.8%
PSCC
2.9%

Financial Services

PSCM
0.1%
PSCC

-

Communication Services

PSCM

-

PSCC

-

Consumer Defensive

PSCM

-

PSCC
90.4%

Healthcare

PSCM

-

PSCC

-

Industrials

PSCM

-

PSCC
3.0%

Real Estate

PSCM

-

PSCC

-

Technology

PSCM

-

PSCC

-

Utilities

PSCM

-

PSCC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCM vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCM
PSCM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PSCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCM vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCMPSCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.96

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

-0.36

+4.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.51

-0.63

+17.14

PSCM vs. PSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCM Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the PSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCM and PSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCMPSCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

-0.33

+2.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

-0.03

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.32

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.55

-0.16

Drawdowns

PSCM vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCM drawdown since its inception was -51.34%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCM and PSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCMPSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.34%

-33.61%

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-15.17%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.36%

-23.36%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

-23.36%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.34%

-33.61%

-17.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-18.00%

+15.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.90%

-5.97%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

8.68%

-4.90%

Volatility

PSCM vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) at 4.46%. This indicates that PSCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCMPSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

4.46%

+3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

10.73%

+6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.03%

16.47%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.74%

18.24%

+7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.91%

19.29%

+7.62%

PSCM vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PSCM and PSCC have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Dividends

PSCM vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison

PSCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than PSCC's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
2.12%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
1.02%1.17%0.80%0.81%0.93%0.67%1.56%1.14%1.25%0.61%0.76%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCM and PSCC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCM has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to PSCC (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCM dropped -51.34% vs PSCC's -33.61%.

On 10-year performance, PSCM leads with 12.90% vs 6.15% for PSCC. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSCM has performed better with a 12.90% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCM and PSCC have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.02% for PSCM.

PSCM is categorized as Materials, while PSCC is Consumer Staples Equities. PSCM tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples.

PSCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCM and PSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer