PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PSCI vs. UCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PSCI vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSCI (Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCI returned 14.92%/yr vs -11.31%/yr for UCO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCI charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

PSCI vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCI achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCI has outperformed UCO with an annualized return of 14.92%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively lower -11.31% annualized return.

PSCI

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.56%
YTD
13.72%
6M
13.66%
1Y
35.33%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
14.92%

UCO

1D
2.71%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
149.12%
6M
137.09%
1Y
120.48%
3Y*
25.90%
5Y*
22.16%
10Y*
-11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCI vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF		13.72%13.50%16.68%31.64%-9.02%24.44%12.02%29.80%-13.20%17.52%
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil		149.12%-29.75%5.36%-13.89%39.71%139.26%-92.91%53.83%-43.26%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCI and UCO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.26

The correlation between PSCI and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil

Often compared with PSCI:
PSCI vs. AIRRPSCI vs. PSCCPSCI vs. PSCMPSCI vs. UBSIPSCI vs. PSCFPSCI vs. VBPSCI vs. XAR
Often compared with UCO:
UCO vs. USOUCO vs. SCOUCO vs. OILUUCO vs. BOILUCO vs. ERXUCO vs. LABUUCO vs. OIH

Return for Risk

PSCI vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PSCI
PSCI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PSCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
UCO
UCO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCI vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PSCIUCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.69
2.12

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.49
2.46

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

3.49

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.11

6.60

+1.51

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSCI vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCI and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PSCIUCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.12

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.37

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

-0.16

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

-0.34

+0.91

Drawdowns

PSCI vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCI drawdown since its inception was -45.55%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCI and UCO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PSCIUCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.55%

-99.95%

+54.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-34.77%

+19.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.36%

-50.38%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-67.24%

+37.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.55%

-98.75%

+53.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-99.23%

+96.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-85.49%

+78.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

18.33%

-13.96%

Volatility

PSCI vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) is 6.10%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.83%. This indicates that PSCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PSCIUCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

20.83%

-14.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.45%

46.44%

-30.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.05%

57.11%

-36.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.02%

59.78%

-36.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.25%

71.36%

-46.11%

PSCI vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCI vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

PSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF		1.40%1.56%0.65%0.72%0.87%0.69%0.59%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.74%1.02%
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PSCI and UCO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCO has higher volatility (20.83%) compared to PSCI (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCI dropped -45.55% vs UCO's -99.95%.

On 10-year performance, PSCI leads with 14.92% vs -11.31% for UCO. On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCI has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSCI has performed better with a 14.92% return vs -11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

PSCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

PSCI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. PSCI tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index, while UCO tracks Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCI and 0.95% for UCO.

UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCI and UCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer