PSCI vs. SHPP
PSCI (Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF) and SHPP (Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - PSCI tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index while SHPP tracks the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSCI returned 19.32%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for SHPP. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSCI charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for SHPP.
Performance
PSCI vs. SHPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PSCI having a 18.13% return and SHPP slightly lower at 18.08%.
PSCI
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.64%
SHPP
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $892.59K | $880.26K | $789.49K | |
| $5.70K | $6.05K | $3.27K |
PSCI vs. SHPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 18.13% | 13.50% | 16.68% | 31.64% | -1.10% |
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 18.08% | 12.88% | 0.76% | 20.86% | -4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCI and SHPP is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022 | 0.75 |
The correlation between PSCI and SHPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCI vs. SHPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCI
SHPP
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
PSCI
SHPP
Technology
PSCI
SHPP
Consumer Cyclical
PSCI
SHPP
Basic Materials
PSCI
SHPP
-
Energy
PSCI
SHPP
-
Real Estate
PSCI
SHPP
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCI
SHPP
Healthcare
PSCI
SHPP
-
Communication Services
PSCI
SHPP
Financial Services
PSCI
SHPP
Utilities
PSCI
-
SHPP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCI vs. SHPP — Risk / Return Rank
PSCI
SHPP
PSCI vs. SHPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) and Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCI | SHPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.40 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.11 | 9.36 | -3.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCI vs. SHPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCI drawdown since its inception was -45.55%, which is greater than SHPP's maximum drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCI and SHPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCI | SHPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.55% | -21.57% | -23.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -11.06% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | -18.84% | -10.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -0.96% | -4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -4.16% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 2.82% | +1.71% |
Volatility
PSCI vs. SHPP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) at 2.87%. This indicates that PSCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCI | SHPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 2.87% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 12.54% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 15.30% | +6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 17.33% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.25% | 17.33% | +7.92% |
PSCI vs. SHPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SHPP's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCI vs. SHPP - Dividend Comparison
PSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than SHPP's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 1.34% | 1.56% | 0.65% | 0.72% | 0.87% | 0.69% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 1.02% |
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 1.69% | 1.80% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCI and SHPP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCI has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to SHPP (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCI dropped -45.55% vs SHPP's -21.57%.
On 3-year performance, PSCI leads with 19.32% vs 10.45% for SHPP. On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SHPP has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSCI has performed better with a 19.32% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SHPP.
SHPP has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.34% for PSCI.
PSCI tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index, while SHPP tracks Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCI and 0.61% for SHPP.
SHPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCI and SHPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer