PSCC vs. SPHQ
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.15%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 6.15%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- -5.46%
- 3Y*
- -1.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 15.48%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 23.22%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 5.02% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 15.48% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and SPHQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PSCC and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PSCC
SPHQ
Industrials
PSCC
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
SPHQ
Communication Services
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Energy
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Financial Services
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
PSCC
-
SPHQ
-
Technology
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Utilities
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
SPHQ
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.32 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 2.62 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 11.17 | -11.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 1.85 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.89 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.84 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.53 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -57.83% | +24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -8.90% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -16.57% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -25.04% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -31.60% | -2.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.00% | 0.00% | -18.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -10.70% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 2.08% | +6.60% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.49%. This indicates that PSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 3.49% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 10.18% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 12.62% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 16.45% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 17.86% | +1.43% |
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 2.12% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to SPHQ (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.01% vs 6.15% for PSCC. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.
PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer