PSCC vs. SPHQ
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.95%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 6.95%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
SPHQ
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 13.60% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.54% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and SPHQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PSCC and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PSCC
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
SPHQ
Industrials
PSCC
SPHQ
Financial Services
PSCC
SPHQ
Communication Services
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Energy
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
PSCC
-
SPHQ
-
Technology
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Utilities
PSCC
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
SPHQ
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.34 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 2.92 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 12.48 | -11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -57.83% | +24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -8.90% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -16.57% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -25.04% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -31.60% | -2.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.31% | -2.93% | -8.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -10.68% | +4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 2.07% | +6.62% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 5.88% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 11.30% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 13.46% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 16.59% | +1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 17.91% | +1.42% |
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than SPHQ's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.72% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to PSCC (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.46% vs 6.95% for PSCC. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.07% for SPHQ.
PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer