PSCC vs. PBJ
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds from Invesco - PSCC tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples while PBJ tracks the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 7.15%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for PBJ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PBJ.
Performance
PSCC vs. PBJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly higher than PBJ's 6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has outperformed PBJ with an annualized return of 7.15%, while PBJ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 15.79%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- 1.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
PBJ
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 0.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
PSCC vs. PBJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 15.79% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 6.04% | -1.86% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 26.88% | 5.53% | 17.50% | -11.21% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and PBJ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PSCC and PBJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCC vs. PBJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
PBJ
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
PBJ
Basic Materials
PSCC
PBJ
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
PBJ
Industrials
PSCC
PBJ
Financial Services
PSCC
PBJ
Communication Services
PSCC
-
PBJ
-
Energy
PSCC
-
PBJ
-
Healthcare
PSCC
-
PBJ
-
Real Estate
PSCC
-
PBJ
-
Technology
PSCC
-
PBJ
-
Utilities
PSCC
-
PBJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. PBJ — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
PBJ
PSCC vs. PBJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCC | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.02 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.05 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | 0.11 | +0.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. PBJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum PBJ drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and PBJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -39.15% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -12.48% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -12.99% | -10.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -15.81% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -28.49% | -5.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.59% | -6.79% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -5.40% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 5.43% | +3.26% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. PBJ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) at 4.40%. This indicates that PSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 4.40% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 9.42% | +2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 12.70% | +4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 13.77% | +4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 15.13% | +4.21% |
PSCC vs. PBJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PBJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. PBJ - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than PBJ's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.29% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.69% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and PBJ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to PBJ (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs PBJ's -39.15%.
On 10-year performance, PSCC leads with 7.15% vs 5.24% for PBJ. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCC has performed better with a 7.15% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.29% for PBJ.
PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.63% for PBJ.
PSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and PBJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer