PSCC vs. DBMF
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. PSCC is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCC returned -0.20%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
PSCC vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 9.70% return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- -2.82%
- 3Y*
- -1.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
DBMF
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCC vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 7.16% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 7.36% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 9.70% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and DBMF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | 0.07 |
PSCC vs. DBMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
DBMF
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
DBMF
Basic Materials
PSCC
DBMF
Industrials
PSCC
DBMF
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
DBMF
Communication Services
PSCC
-
DBMF
Energy
PSCC
-
DBMF
Financial Services
PSCC
-
DBMF
Healthcare
PSCC
-
DBMF
Real Estate
PSCC
-
DBMF
Technology
PSCC
-
DBMF
Utilities
PSCC
-
DBMF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
DBMF
PSCC vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.48 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 4.58 | -4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 16.82 | -17.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 2.26 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.63 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.74 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -20.39% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -6.10% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -15.60% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -20.39% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.33% | -2.42% | -13.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -6.58% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 1.66% | +7.02% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.88%. This indicates that PSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 2.88% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 10.00% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 12.35% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 12.55% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 12.43% | +6.86% |
PSCC vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than DBMF's 5.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.22% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 2.08% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and DBMF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DBMF (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 7.93% vs -0.20% for PSCC. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 7.93% return vs -0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 2.08% for PSCC.
PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer