PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSC vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSC vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 21.09% return.


PSC

1D
-0.58%
1M
-1.08%
6M
13.74%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
31.90%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.86%

USVM

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.81%
6M
15.17%
YTD
21.09%
1Y
35.70%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.70M$7.59M$7.79M
$4.40M$4.64M$4.70M

PSC vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
18.31%13.41%12.38%18.51%-15.91%32.56%13.30%18.99%-11.35%5.67%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
21.09%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PSC and USVM is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.89

The correlation between PSC and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSC vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSC
USVM

Technology

19.5%
9.6%

Healthcare

16.9%
12.6%

Financial Services

16.9%
24.6%

Industrials

16.8%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
12.3%

Real Estate

5.3%
9.4%

Energy

5.1%
5.0%

Basic Materials

4.1%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.6%
3.0%

Utilities

2.4%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
3.6%

Technology

PSC
19.5%
USVM
9.6%

Healthcare

PSC
16.9%
USVM
12.6%

Financial Services

PSC
16.9%
USVM
24.6%

Industrials

PSC
16.8%
USVM
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PSC
8.1%
USVM
12.3%

Real Estate

PSC
5.3%
USVM
9.4%

Energy

PSC
5.1%
USVM
5.0%

Basic Materials

PSC
4.1%
USVM
1.7%

Communication Services

PSC
2.6%
USVM
3.0%

Utilities

PSC
2.4%
USVM
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

PSC
2.3%
USVM
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSC vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSC
PSC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSC vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.41

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

4.06

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

15.72

-5.30

PSC vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSC and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSC vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-42.38%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-8.36%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-24.34%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-25.27%

-0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-1.11%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-7.76%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.15%

+0.69%

Volatility

PSC vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 2.91%. This indicates that PSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

2.91%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

10.68%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

14.64%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

19.45%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.19%

21.86%

+1.33%

PSC vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSC vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than USVM's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
0.53%0.67%0.75%0.73%1.92%1.45%1.25%1.47%1.30%0.95%0.35%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.82%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSC and USVM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSC has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to USVM (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 11.10% vs 9.51% for PSC. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 11.10% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.53% for PSC.

PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while USVM is Momentum. PSC tracks Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSC and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer