PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSC vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSC vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 15.26% return.


PSC

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.79%
YTD
13.84%
6M
13.56%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSC vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
13.84%13.41%12.38%18.51%-15.91%32.56%13.30%18.99%-11.35%5.67%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PSC and USVM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.89

The correlation between PSC and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSC vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSC
USVM

Technology

20.3%
11.6%

Industrials

17.7%
12.1%

Financial Services

16.5%
22.0%

Healthcare

15.3%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
11.1%

Energy

6.0%
4.4%

Real Estate

4.6%
11.9%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.8%

Utilities

2.9%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
5.0%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.8%

Technology

PSC
20.3%
USVM
11.6%

Industrials

PSC
17.7%
USVM
12.1%

Financial Services

PSC
16.5%
USVM
22.0%

Healthcare

PSC
15.3%
USVM
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PSC
8.1%
USVM
11.1%

Energy

PSC
6.0%
USVM
4.4%

Real Estate

PSC
4.6%
USVM
11.9%

Basic Materials

PSC
4.2%
USVM
1.8%

Utilities

PSC
2.9%
USVM
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

PSC
2.3%
USVM
5.0%

Communication Services

PSC
2.2%
USVM
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSC vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSC
PSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSC vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCUSVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

2.05

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.98

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.66

-0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.55

13.76

-4.21

PSC vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSC and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCUSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.05

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.50

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.49

+0.01

Drawdowns

PSC vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-42.38%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-8.36%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-24.34%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-25.27%

-0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.57%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-7.90%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.22%

+0.63%

Volatility

PSC vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 4.50%. This indicates that PSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.50%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

10.73%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

14.93%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

19.65%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

22.01%

+1.29%

PSC vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSC vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than USVM's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
0.58%0.67%0.75%0.73%1.92%1.45%1.25%1.47%1.30%0.95%0.35%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PSC and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PSC has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 8.06% for PSC. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.58% for PSC.

PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while USVM is Momentum. PSC tracks Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSC and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer