PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSC vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSC vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.


PSC

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.79%
YTD
13.84%
6M
13.56%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSC vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
13.84%13.41%12.38%18.51%-15.91%32.56%13.30%18.99%-11.35%15.93%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PSC and USL is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.19

The correlation between PSC and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSC vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSC
USL

Technology

20.3%

-

Industrials

17.7%

-

Financial Services

16.5%
4.5%

Healthcare

15.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%

-

Energy

6.0%

-

Real Estate

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.3%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Technology

PSC
20.3%
USL

-

Industrials

PSC
17.7%
USL

-

Financial Services

PSC
16.5%
USL
4.5%

Healthcare

PSC
15.3%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSC
8.1%
USL

-

Energy

PSC
6.0%
USL

-

Real Estate

PSC
4.6%
USL

-

Basic Materials

PSC
4.2%
USL

-

Utilities

PSC
2.9%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

PSC
2.3%
USL

-

Communication Services

PSC
2.2%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSC vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSC
PSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSC vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCUSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

2.04

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.58

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.47

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.55

7.02

+2.53

PSC vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSC and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.04

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.58

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.01

+0.49

Drawdowns

PSC vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-89.06%

+42.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-16.76%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-23.33%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-33.82%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-38.16%

+37.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-61.46%

+53.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

8.27%

-5.42%

Volatility

PSC vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) is 4.93%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that PSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

10.53%

-5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

23.33%

-10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

28.54%

-9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

30.08%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

32.35%

-9.05%

PSC vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSC vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
0.58%0.67%0.75%0.73%1.92%1.45%1.25%1.47%1.30%0.95%0.35%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSC and USL have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to PSC (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.41% vs 8.06% for PSC. On fees, PSC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

PSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. PSC tracks Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSC and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer