PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSC vs. PY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSC vs. PY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Value ETF (PY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly higher than PY's 4.65% return.


PSC

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.79%
YTD
13.84%
6M
13.56%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

PY

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.39%
YTD
4.65%
6M
5.77%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSC vs. PY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
13.84%13.41%12.38%18.51%-15.91%32.56%13.30%18.99%-11.35%15.93%
PY
Principal Value ETF
4.65%7.74%16.79%9.11%-5.10%34.83%2.71%26.87%-13.34%18.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PSC and PY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.68

The correlation between PSC and PY shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSC vs. PY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSC
PY

Technology

20.3%
25.0%

Industrials

17.7%
9.3%

Financial Services

16.5%
16.5%

Healthcare

15.3%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
11.0%

Energy

6.0%
5.6%

Real Estate

4.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.2%

Utilities

2.9%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
11.5%

Communication Services

2.2%
5.1%

Technology

PSC
20.3%
PY
25.0%

Industrials

PSC
17.7%
PY
9.3%

Financial Services

PSC
16.5%
PY
16.5%

Healthcare

PSC
15.3%
PY
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PSC
8.1%
PY
11.0%

Energy

PSC
6.0%
PY
5.6%

Real Estate

PSC
4.6%
PY
1.1%

Basic Materials

PSC
4.2%
PY
1.2%

Utilities

PSC
2.9%
PY
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSC
2.3%
PY
11.5%

Communication Services

PSC
2.2%
PY
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSC vs. PY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSC
PSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PY
PY Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSC vs. PY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Value ETF (PY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.20

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.54

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.55

8.52

+1.03

PSC vs. PY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the PY Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSC and PY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.48

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.54

-0.04

Drawdowns

PSC vs. PY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, roughly equal to the maximum PY drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and PY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-45.44%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-6.20%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-17.84%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-17.84%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.50%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-5.05%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

1.85%

+1.00%

Volatility

PSC vs. PY - Volatility Comparison

Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Principal Value ETF (PY) at 2.38%. This indicates that PSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

2.38%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

7.27%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

10.52%

+8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

15.77%

+5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

20.08%

+3.22%

PSC vs. PY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSC vs. PY - Dividend Comparison

PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than PY's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
0.58%0.67%0.75%0.73%1.92%1.45%1.25%1.47%1.30%0.95%0.35%
PY
Principal Value ETF
2.12%2.14%2.22%2.68%3.02%2.83%2.95%2.25%2.34%1.68%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSC and PY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSC has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to PY (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs PY's -45.44%.

On 5-year performance, PSC leads with 8.06% vs 7.48% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSC has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.

PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.58% for PSC.

PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PY is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.15% for PY.

PY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSC and PY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer