PSC vs. PY
PSC (Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF) and PY (Principal Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal. PSC is passively managed, while PY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSC returned 8.06%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for PY. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PY.
Performance
PSC vs. PY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly higher than PY's 4.65% return.
PSC
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 27.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
PY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
PSC vs. PY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 13.84% | 13.41% | 12.38% | 18.51% | -15.91% | 32.56% | 13.30% | 18.99% | -11.35% | 15.93% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 4.65% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 2.71% | 26.87% | -13.34% | 18.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSC and PY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PSC and PY shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSC vs. PY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSC
PY
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
PSC
PY
Industrials
PSC
PY
Financial Services
PSC
PY
Healthcare
PSC
PY
Consumer Cyclical
PSC
PY
Energy
PSC
PY
Real Estate
PSC
PY
Basic Materials
PSC
PY
Utilities
PSC
PY
Consumer Defensive
PSC
PY
Communication Services
PSC
PY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSC vs. PY — Risk / Return Rank
PSC
PY
PSC vs. PY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Value ETF (PY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSC | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.51 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.20 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.54 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | 8.52 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSC | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.51 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.54 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
PSC vs. PY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, roughly equal to the maximum PY drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and PY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSC | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -45.44% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -6.20% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.49% | -17.84% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.86% | -17.84% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.50% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -5.05% | -3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 1.85% | +1.00% |
Volatility
PSC vs. PY - Volatility Comparison
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Principal Value ETF (PY) at 2.38%. This indicates that PSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSC | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 2.38% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 7.27% | +5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 10.52% | +8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 15.77% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 20.08% | +3.22% |
PSC vs. PY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSC vs. PY - Dividend Comparison
PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than PY's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 0.58% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.73% | 1.92% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 1.47% | 1.30% | 0.95% | 0.35% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSC and PY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSC has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to PY (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs PY's -45.44%.
On 5-year performance, PSC leads with 8.06% vs 7.48% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSC has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.
PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.58% for PSC.
PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PY is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.15% for PY.
PY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSC and PY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer