PSC vs. PY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSC (Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF) and PY (Principal Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal. PSC is passively managed, while PY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSC returned 8.77%/yr vs 7.97%/yr for PY. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PY.

Performance

PSC vs. PY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Value ETF (PY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly higher than PY's 3.40% return.

PSC

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 17.73%
• 6M: 15.20%
• 1Y: 31.66%
• 3Y*: 19.46%
• 5Y*: 8.77%
• 10Y*: —

PY

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 2.76%
• 1Y: 12.67%
• 3Y*: 12.66%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 10.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSC vs. PY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF	17.73%	13.41%	12.38%	18.51%	-15.91%	32.56%	13.30%	18.99%	-11.35%	15.93%
PY Principal Value ETF	3.40%	7.74%	16.79%	9.11%	-5.10%	34.83%	2.71%	26.87%	-13.34%	18.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PSC and PY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016	0.68

The correlation between PSC and PY shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSC vs. PY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSC	PY
Technology	20.3%	26.9%
Financial Services	17.2%	16.4%
Industrials	16.9%	8.1%
Healthcare	15.8%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	11.0%
Energy	5.6%	5.5%
Real Estate	4.5%	1.0%
Basic Materials	4.2%	1.2%
Utilities	2.7%	1.7%
Communication Services	2.3%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	11.3%

Return for Risk

PSC vs. PY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSC

PSC Risk / Return Rank: 57
PSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
PSC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PSC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

PY

PY Risk / Return Rank: 39
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSC vs. PY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Value ETF (PY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSC	PY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.21	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	1.78	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.22	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	2.05	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	6.83	+4.33

PSC vs. PY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the PY Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSC and PY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSC vs. PY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, roughly equal to the maximum PY drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and PY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSC	PY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.69%	-45.44%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.95%	-6.20%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.49%	-17.84%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.86%	-17.84%	-8.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-1.69%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-5.03%	-3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	1.86%	+0.99%

Volatility

PSC vs. PY - Volatility Comparison

Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Principal Value ETF (PY) at 2.75%. This indicates that PSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSC	PY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	2.75%	+2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.32%	7.32%	+6.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.96%	10.53%	+8.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.02%	15.72%	+5.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.28%	20.08%	+3.20%

PSC vs. PY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PY's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSC vs. PY - Dividend Comparison

PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than PY's 2.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF	0.57%	0.67%	0.75%	0.73%	1.92%	1.45%	1.25%	1.47%	1.30%	0.95%	0.35%
PY Principal Value ETF	2.15%	2.14%	2.22%	2.68%	3.02%	2.83%	2.95%	2.25%	2.34%	1.68%	1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSC and PY in my portfolio?

PSC and PY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSC or PY?

PSC has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to PY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs PY's -45.44%.

Which ETF is better, PSC or PY?

On 5-year performance, PSC leads with 8.77% vs 7.97% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSC or PY?

Over the 5-year period, PSC has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSC or PY?

PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSC or PY?

PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.57% for PSC.

What is the main difference between PSC and PY?

PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PY is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.15% for PY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.