PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSC vs. ISCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSC vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly higher than ISCB's 11.43% return.


PSC

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.79%
YTD
13.84%
6M
13.56%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

ISCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
2.77%
YTD
11.43%
6M
11.42%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSC vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
13.84%13.41%12.38%18.51%-15.91%32.56%13.30%18.99%-11.35%15.93%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
11.43%12.46%10.90%19.51%-19.04%17.46%6.29%29.42%-13.92%12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PSC and ISCB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.87

The correlation between PSC and ISCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSC vs. ISCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSC
ISCB

Technology

20.3%
14.6%

Industrials

17.7%
18.5%

Financial Services

16.5%
15.9%

Healthcare

15.3%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
11.8%

Energy

6.0%
4.9%

Real Estate

4.6%
8.2%

Basic Materials

4.2%
4.6%

Utilities

2.9%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
3.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.6%

Technology

PSC
20.3%
ISCB
14.6%

Industrials

PSC
17.7%
ISCB
18.5%

Financial Services

PSC
16.5%
ISCB
15.9%

Healthcare

PSC
15.3%
ISCB
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PSC
8.1%
ISCB
11.8%

Energy

PSC
6.0%
ISCB
4.9%

Real Estate

PSC
4.6%
ISCB
8.2%

Basic Materials

PSC
4.2%
ISCB
4.6%

Utilities

PSC
2.9%
ISCB
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

PSC
2.3%
ISCB
3.4%

Communication Services

PSC
2.2%
ISCB
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSC vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSC
PSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSC vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCISCBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

1.80

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.60

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.15

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.55

11.26

-1.70

PSC vs. ISCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the ISCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSC and ISCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCISCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.80

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.27

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.38

+0.12

Drawdowns

PSC vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and ISCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCISCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-61.25%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-9.39%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-26.22%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-29.94%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.67%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-9.80%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.63%

+0.22%

Volatility

PSC vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison

Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) at 4.28%. This indicates that PSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCISCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.28%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

11.43%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

16.51%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

21.39%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

22.68%

+0.62%

PSC vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSC vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison

PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than ISCB's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.27%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
0.58%0.67%0.75%0.73%1.92%1.45%1.25%1.47%1.30%0.95%0.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PSC and ISCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PSC has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to ISCB (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs ISCB's -61.25%.

On 5-year performance, PSC leads with 8.06% vs 5.72% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSC has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 5.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.

ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.58% for PSC.

PSC tracks Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.04% for ISCB.

ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSC and ISCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer