PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXV vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRXV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRXV and FDL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXV

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRXV vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRXVFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.54

0.45

+4.09

Drawdowns

PRXV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXVFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-65.93%

+64.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-2.18%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-9.66%

+9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

Volatility

PRXV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXVFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

11.28%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.66%

14.31%

-4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.66%

17.11%

-7.45%

PRXV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRXV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
PRXV
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRXV and FDL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

They also come from different issuers: Praxis and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.45% for FDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXV and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer